NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF THE
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
TRG
Docket No: 7824-99
28 June 2000
Dear-
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 June 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 27 January
2000, a copy of which is enclosed.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In this connection the Board substantially
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
22
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
t 34-5 103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1741
MMSR-6
28 Feb
00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
BCNR APPLICATION
-USMC
IN THE CASE OF CAPTAIN
(a) MMER Route Sheet of
(b) Title 10 USC, Section 6323
14Jan00, Docket No. 7824-99
The reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Captain
1.
B request to have his records corrected to show that he
is eligible for retirement from the Marine Corps.
s commissioned on 2 September 1990. He
officer on 1 September
nt lim
requested retirement to be
On 5 July 1996 Captain
2.
Captain
was appoint
1995.
effective on 1 March 1997.
disapproved by this Headquarters due to insufficient commissioned
(b) requires that an Officer complete 8 years
service.
of commissioned service to be eligible for retirement.
His retirement request was
Reference
Captain
3.
ment eligibility.
his petition not be granted favorable consideration.
- does not meet the requirements for retire-
We must therefore, regretfully, recommend that
4.
Point of contact is Captain
MMSR-2, 784-9324.
by direction
F
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07958-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your application, thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08700-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE Y S WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 17 July 200 8700-01 2 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. 87130-01 The reference requests an advisory opinion on Sergeant request to correct his records to show a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code other than the code assigned when he was transferred...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00283-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 21 March 2001 and undated, copies of which are attached. References (b) through (d) refer to clinical studies on head injury and multiple sclerosis. '_s request to have his records corrected to show that he was retired from the Marine Corps by reason of "combat related" physical disability in the rank of major.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03521-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on former Sergeant equest to have his records corrected to show that he was not discharged from the Marine Corps on 27 May 1999, and to further show that he is retired by reason of physical disability. MMEA concurs with the recommendation made by Mrs. Jr., Head, Separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06756-98
Retirement Policy which states that Marines in the grade of Gunnery Sergeant or above, must serve two years in their current pay grade prior to transfer to retirement status. 6756-98 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery 1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Gunnery Sergeant petition with regard to his retirement rank.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00548-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05733-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your former spouse naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. 5733-01 15FebO1, included with petition The reference requests an advisory opinion on Mrs. petition to correct her late former husband, Barnes' record to show that he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02219-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2000. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 17 May 2000, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07928-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2007. In addition, it considered an advisory opinion dated 4 May 2007 that was furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps. In this regard, the Board was not persuaded that the notification of the preliminary findings of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) was mailed to an incorrect address.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04905-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps dated10 August 2006, with enclosure, and 20 September 2006, copies ofwhich are attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reference requests an advisory opinionto correct his record to show that he was promoted to the rank of major prior to...