DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC
20370.5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 7908-01
27 November 2001
--
j._.-.
-
This is in reference to
provisions of title
your application
of
10
Ilnitetl
the
St;~tcs
(lode,
section
1552.
for- correction
of your naval record pursuant to the
(:orrcction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
for-
on 27 November 200
I
. Your allegations of error and
aclministrative regulations and procedures applicable
the
l%mrtl
your application
A three-member panel of
session, considered
ili_justice were reviewed in accordance with
to the proceedings
your application,
mat~~t-ial
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by
which is attached.
oi‘ this
together
CM(’
Bo;lrd. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
with all
subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and
II addition, the Board considered the advisory
I
I~~~I~~oI-;II~~~~II~~ 140013 MMPR 2 of 13 November 2001, a copy of
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will
upon request.
he furnished
of‘
your- case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Boar-d reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
It is regretted that the circumstances
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of
presunlpti~m of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
In this regard, it is important
material error or
lm~bable
iriSjustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAVY
rlEADQUARTERS
“NlTEO STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO,
VlRGlNlA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1400/3
MMPR-2
13 Nov 0 1
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
Ref:
(a) BCNR Memo of 5 Nov 2001
(b) Yr msg 1414142 Jun 00
(c) Yr
ltr 1400 Admin of
(d)
P1400.32C
MC0
14 Jun 00
In reference (a) we were asked to provide an advisory opinion
1.
on Gunnery Sergeant
consideration for promotion to master sergeant.
request for remedial
VLL
7
_I
..YY
_
_I
_
_I.
L-U-AIL-
----
2.
Reserve Staff Noncommissioned Officer Selection Board.
l_.!_
-
__--
Gunnery Sergeant
---.!___1L._
----
----_
~
equested his name be removed from the master sergeant
was selected by the CY 1999
____~_,_
__-..-__
c) and he transferred to the Fleet
&
Per paragraph 3103.6 of reference
promotion list (references b
Marine Corps Reserve (FMCR).
(d), Marines refusing to extend or reenlist to have sufficient
obligated service,
appropriate selection list and the Marine will become ineligible
for promotion co
Per his request,
Gunnery Sergeant
name was removed from the master
sergeant promotion list.
will have their names removed from the
'n the future.
Before
UUIIIILL
2
“UI~
,
La ”““
_
LJGLy~arlL
)
We recommend that Gunnery Sergeant,
3.
promotion to master sergeant.
not receive
4.
at DSN:
Point of contact at this command is
278-9710 or COMM: (7
- Major, U.S. Marine Corps
Enlisted Promotion Section
Head,
By direction of
the Commandant of the Marine
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01138-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 BJG Docket No: 18 January 2002 11X3-01 C RET Dear Master Serg This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. memorandum for the record dated 15 January 2002, Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) will remove from your OMPF the references to your convictions. However, since he has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00229-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03119-01
1 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: SE OF STAFF SERGEAN Staff Sergeant 1. has been reviewed concerning his request for removal of the Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 000714 and CMC letter of selection from the 2000 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, from his service records. 118(11) page 11 entry dated 1450/5 MMPR-2 dated 22 Aug 2000, revocation application with supporting documents MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03401-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 3401-02 10 September 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03723-01
has requested to have his date of rank selected by the CY 1997 Gunnery considered in zone for contends that the reason he was Gunnery Sergeant wh as considered and not selected for 8 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Boards. Gunnery Sergeant promotion by CY 1997 The specific reason(s) why he was not selected by either of these two Many high quality Marines are not selected boards is not known. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06254-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Y S LCC:ddj Docket No: 6254-01 20 February 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01607-07
On April 15, 2005, Petitioner, through counsel, submitted an application to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) seeking removal of the January 1, 2001 to July 7,2Docket No. 01607-072001 fitness report, removal of naval records pertaining to the NJP and a remedial promotion board See enclosure (4)g. Petitioner’s request was bifurcated. Here, Petitioner did not take any action to have his fitness report removed until 15 April 2005, well after the dates of the Selection Boards...