DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
ELP
Docket No. 7869-00
6 April 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on
21 April 2000 for four years at age 20.
active duty on 27 April
Enlistment Program."
20.00 for four years in the
You were ordered to
"TAR
The record reflects that on 26 May 2000 you were referred to the
An evaluation was directed due to
recruit mental health unit.
your disclosure of psychiatric treatment at ages 13-14 for which
you were placed on medication.
You claimed that you did not get
along with people and reported physical and emotional abuse by
two stepfathers; suspensions from school numerous times for
arguing, fighting, and cursing; and claims of being in about 50
fights since age 10, the last occurring a year prior to
enlistment.
You stated that the Army had separated you with an
entry level separation after being in the recruit training for
only week.
An evaluation by your drill commander stated that
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02949-01
You state but you asserted that you Subsequently, the Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals, discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01
Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02015-01
In connection with this processing, you were processed for Subsequently, the You state in your application that you wanted to leave recruit training so that you could solve some personal problems. is separated prior to completing recruit training after being diagnosed with a personality disorder that interfered with the ability to perform military duties. no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00514-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. You were so discharged on 24 April 2000. Reglations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individual separated by reason erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08697-01
A three-member panel of the Board for CorrectLon of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02397-01
The charges were referred to On 15 April 1999 you submitted a request for an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court-martial on the foregoing charges. the good of the service is an administrative discharge and is foregoing contentions and claims recharacterization of your discharge you accepted discharge rather than The Board noted that discharge for 2 Furthermore, you requested guiltto the charges, and your rarely under honorable conditions. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01982-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were processed for an In connection with this At that time you were not recommended for On 12 September pro&ssing, You state in your application that you do not deserve the RE-4 reenlistment code because you were only...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03854-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the discharge authority directed a general discharge by reason of He stated that the Navy had invested consider- fraudulent entry. determining what your true statement is, the governor of your state or the one you made while at the service school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03498-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were referred to the On 15 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the personality disorder....