DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
2 NAVY ANNE
Y
NA’IAL RECORD
X
WASHINGTON DC
2037~.5100
S
ELP
Docket No. 7822-00
15 June 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
Board for Correction
A three-member panel for the
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
bf Navy
After careful and conscientious
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
consid.eration of the entire
The record reflects that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 April
1991 for four years at age 21.
On 27 August 1992, you were
advanced to EW3 (E-4) and extended your enlistment for an
additional period of 12 months.
EW2 (E-5) on 16 December 1994.
or about 25 March 1996 for four years.
contract is not on file in your record..
Your were further advanced to
It
However, the enlistment
app'ears that you reenlisted on
standards"- to "greatly exceeds standards."
The record reflects that you had no disciplinary actions in
nearly nine years of active service.
from July 1994 through March 1999 was consistently rated as
"above
Evaluation Report and Counseling Record, as extended, for the
period 16 March 1999 to 24 March 2000 showed declining
performance.
you exercised poor judgment and immaturity in the handling of
your financial affairs,
been involved in two incidents of
The reporting senior noted that during this period
Your performance as an EW2
However, the
domestic violence, and failed your semi-annual physical readiness
test.
discharged on 24 March 2000 with an
You were not recommended for retention and were honorably
RX-4 reenlistment code.
However,
ef.fect that the only deroga-
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
The
to individuals who are not recommended for reenlistment.
Board noted your contention to the
tory material in your record is the evaluation report that was
tne Board is reluctant to
submitted upon discharge.
submit its judgment for that of the
rlaporting senior who is on
the scene and is best qualified to determine who should be
reenlisted.
personal financial affairs and two incidents of domestic violence
provided sufficient justification for a non-recommendation for
retention and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
concluded that the reenlistment code was proper and no change is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
The Board believed that
poor judgment in handling
The Board
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01549-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. an altercation with your spouse, off base, which resulted in a military protective order against you; on 14 May 1998, you were ‘counseled for falsely representing yourself in civil court; on 22 June 1998, you were counseled for being disrespectful in language to a senior noncommissioned officer during a live fire exercise; and on 27 August 1998, you...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012072
Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System), paragraph 4-3, states commanders are required to look into alleged errors, injustices, and illegalities in evaluation reports. If you feel your OER is in error I recommend taking your appeal to the board of corrections." Army Regulation 623-3, section II (Commander's or Commandant's Inquiry), paragraph 4-3, states, "[Commanders] (OER and noncommissioned officer evaluation report) or commandants (academic evaluation report) are required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05726-06
05726-06 16 July 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301701
Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02760-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A review of the 2. reas administrative portion of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning being arrested and charged with domestic violence and assault, not being recommended for promotion, and not being recommended for reenlistment because of commission of a serious...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00436
(Change Discharge to Honorable Discharge, and Change the Reason and Authority for Discharge) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. SUBJECT: Discharge Upgrade Request Dear Members (DRB), 1.1 am a Veteran of the United States Air Force I served in the 22Dd Maintenance Squadron of McConnell AFB, as an Aircraft Fuel Systems Journeyman, I have bad the chance to review my military records and the contents of my Discharge notification Package. For this misconduct you received an Article 15, dated 27 October...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01
A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00303-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were 8 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 13-month period documenting three counselings and problems with your government credit card debt provided sufficient justify- cation for a non-recommendation for retention and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. ...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00486
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION (f) (1).As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST 5420.174C.We ask for the Board’s careful and sympathetic consideration of all the evidence of record used in rendering a fair and...