Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07764-01
Original file (07764-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

Ic
LCC: 
Docket No: 7764-01
10 October 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref:

Encl:

(a)

(1)
(2)
(3)

Title 

10 U.S.C.  

1552

DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Sub.ject’s naval record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
1.
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show that when Petitioner decided to reenlist thereby changing his mind about
separating from the Navy, he returned from terminal leave and reported directly to the USS
Enterprise Detachment, Norfolk VA which was the unit he was assigned to prior to departing
on terminal leave.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner
allegations of error and injustice on IO October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

’s

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. After reviewing the correspondence attached as enclosure  

that the request has  

meTit and warrants favorable action.

(2), the Board concluded

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
contents of enclosure  
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
following corrective action.

and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 7764-01

a.

BuPers Order 261 

1, issued on 18 September 2001 via message R 1809372 SEP 01

was declared null and void and was revoked immediately after being issued via message
R 1809402 SEP 01.

b. The 2 1 month extension executed on 21 September 2001 to enlistment of

29 August 1997 is null and void.

-

C.

Petitioner returned from terminal leave and reported to the USS Enterprise

Detachment, Norfolk, VA on 6 July 2001.

d. On 6 July 2001 Petitioner executed an extension to his enlistment of 29 August 1997
for 2 months. Petitioner’s enlistment of 29 August 1997 will expire on 28 October 2001.

e.

That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

10 October 2001



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04058-01

    Original file (04058-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a reenlistment vice an extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03525-10

    Original file (03525-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her transfer orders reflect a date of 7 November 2009 vice 7 January 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 May 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03383-03

    Original file (03383-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 19 October 2001 is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01178-01

    Original file (01178-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he entitled to reimbursement for no more that what it would have cost the (HHGs) from Alaska, his Home of Record, to his government to move his household goods first duty station. On 12 May 2000 Petitioner executed the appropriate documents whereby he HHGs; voluntarily elected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09949-10

    Original file (09949-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01261-00

    Original file (01261-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be filed enclosure (1) with this corrected to show that the 24 month extension executed on 9 September 1997 be declared null and void. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06780-07

    Original file (06780-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 811/445 dtd 14 Sep 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04311-05

    Original file (04311-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 16 September to 12 November 2004 (copy at Tab A). By memorandum of 18 April 2005 (copy in enclosure (1)), the general court-martial authority (GCMA) concluded “the issue is moot” in light of Petitioner’s command’s message to the Navy Personnel Command (NPC),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06669-01

    Original file (06669-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser 31 of 7 November 2001 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to void the discharge issued on 21 January 2000. The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05464-01

    Original file (05464-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the 12 month extension executed on 26 January 2000 be declared null and void . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Ms. Madison, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...