Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07690-01
Original file (07690-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   NAVAL  R E C O R D S  

2   NAVY  A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

HD: hd 
Docket  No:  07690-01 
19 June 2002 

This  is  in  reference to  your  application  for correction of  your  naval  record  pursuant  to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552.  You  requested  that  your 
lieutenant date of  rank  and  effective date be changed  from  1  October 2001  to  1  April 2001 

A three-member panel  of  the  Board  for  Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting in  executive 
session, considered your  application on  13 June 2002.  Your  allegations of error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the  Board  consisted of  your 
application,  together  with  all  material  submitted in  support thereof,  your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition,  the  Board  considered the advisory 
opinions furnished by  the Bureau  of  Medicine and  Surgery, dated  20 November  2001, and  the 
Navy  Personnel Command, dated  15 January 2002,  copies of  which  are attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained 
in  the advisory opinions.  They were unable to find  you  w~.r-c er-r ~ , I I L - ~ U S ~ Y  
allege,  that  you  would  be promoted  to lieutenant in  April  2001;  nor  could they  find that  you 
reasonably relied  on  such advice to your  detriment.  In  view  of  the above,  your  application 
has been  denied.  The names and  votes of  the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished  upon 
request. 

advised, as you 

It  is regretted  that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action cannot be 
taken.  You  are entitled  to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and 
material evidence or other  matter  not  previously  considered by  the  Board.  In  this regard,  it is 
important  to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the 
applicant to demonstrate the existence of  probable  material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosures 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 
BUREAU OF MEDICINE  AND  SURGERY 

2300 E STREET  NW 

WASHINGTON  DC  2 0 3 7 2   5300 

1120 
Ser 522/02-8803 
20 Nov  01 

From: 
To: 

Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery 
Board for Correction of Naval Records 

Subj :  ADVISORY O

USNR. r 

P

I

N

I

~

 

Encl:  (1) BCNR ~ ~ ~ l i c a t - ~  

1.  Enclosure  (1) is forwarded recommending referral of issue to 
Navy  Personnel Command  (NAVPERSCOM-802) for resolution. 

2.  Bureau of Medicine and Surgery  (MED-52) czlculates entry 
grade credit at time of accession for initial grade.  Lieutenant 

ccession entry grade credit was correctly 
years with a recommended entry grade of 

Lieutenant Junior Grade.  Subsequent dates of rank are determined 
by promotion board results and administratively managed by 
NAVPERSCOM-802. 

3.  Your point 
may be reached 

NC, USN, who 

By direction 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE NAVY 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON T N  38055-0000 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF  @'- 

1 5  JAN  ZOO& 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOZCB) 

Encl:  (1) BCNR File 07690-01 

(1) is returned, recommending disapproval of LT 

uest . 

n

o

:

2
 on the Active Duty List  (ADL) for the 
FY-01 Active Duty Lieutenant Staff Selection Promotion Board 
held on 15 May 2000.  The member came on active duty on 22 June 

t

seen before the FY-02 board held on 14 May 2001. 

given the correct date of rank of 1 October 2001. 

3 .   Recomm 

te of rank remain unchanged. 

Deputy Director, Active and 
Reserve Officer Career 
Progression Division 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05172-01

    Original file (05172-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 10 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00294-03

    Original file (00294-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by adjusting the date of rank on his commission as a lieutenant, Dental Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve to reflect credit for his prior service as an 0-3 (captain) in the U. S. Army. ~iyector, Active and Reserve Officer Career Progression Division DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04235-01

    Original file (04235-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure MEMORANDUM From: To: Subj: Ref: 26 Jul 01 Medical Service Corps, BCNR Coordinator (Pers-OOZCB) Officer Community Manager (N131M3) ADVISORY OPINION OF RECONSIDERATION ICO EN SE , USNR (a) BCNR Coord request received 09 Jul 2001 (b) MSC OCM (c) SECNAVINST (N131M3)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02

    Original file (00787-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02907-02

    Original file (02907-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisi filed enclosure (1) with thi corrected to show he was 4 commissioned as a lieutena d&e of rank is 2 lieutenant ns of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be anted two additional years of entry grade credit when he was t in the Medical Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve. Surgery, office with as enclosure (2), the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and ce over the subject matter of this case has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03242-01

    Original file (03242-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. master program E in healt h ’s (c) t Each reference clearly states a qualifyin a concentration in health care selected did not include a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09826-02

    Original file (09826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), PERS-80, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over active and reserve officer career progression matters, has recommended that Petitioner's request to remove his failure of selection by the FY 03 Naval Reserve Line Commander Selection Board be disapproved. e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), Pers-911, the NPC office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05100-03

    Original file (05100-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 7220 Ser 132103-3701 dated 14 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Direc 7 Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY 2300 E STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20372-5300 7220 - Ser 132/03-3701 14 Aug...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06385-01

    Original file (06385-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect entry grade credit for her dietetic internship. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the date of rank on her commission as an ensign, Medical Service Corps, U. S. Naval Reserve as 7 April 1999, vice 7 January 2000; and that her lineal precedence be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98

    Original file (08250-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...