Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07791-00
Original file (07791-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No:
19 April 2001

7791-00

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

ORD OF

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) HQMC Memo 1040 CMT of 27 Mar 01
(2) Subject's naval record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve
(USMCR) filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his
record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 6
November 2000 but continued to serve in the USMCR.

The Board, consisting of Mr.  

2.
Leeman, Mr. Frankfurt and Ms.
Wiley, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C .

He was granted at least some of  

Petitioner reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on
Subsequently, he extended that

7 August 1996 for two years.
enlistment on six or seven occasions, apparently totaling 27
months.
he was having difficulty obtaining a fitness report which was
required before his reenlistment could be authorized. He
obtained the fitness report on 5 November 2000.
states he was honorably discharged at the expiration of
enlistment, as extended, on 6 November 2000.

Petitioner

th&wextensions  because

d.

At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from

Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) which explains the situation and
recommends as follows:

This office recommends that his missing fitness report
from the period 19 May 1997 to 6 March 1998 be included
in his official military personnel file, and that he be
reinstated in the Marine Corps Reserve with no break in
service.

e. 'The Board is aware that regulations state that the

total of all extensions cannot exceed 48 months.

CONCLUSION:

The Board notes that Petitioner was attempting to

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
reenlist, but only obtained the missing fitness report one day
prior to his expiration of enlistment.
the Board agrees with the recommendations contained in the
advisory opinion.

Given the circumstances,

Therefore, the record should be corrected to show that he was not
discharged on 6 November 2000 and a 21 month extension became
effective on 7 November 2000.
This correction will make the
expiration of his enlistment 6 August 2002.

Since Petitioner was in a pay status at the time of his discharge
and his case has been pending for over five months, the Board
further concludes that the record should be corrected by
crediting him with four pay drills per month for six months.
he attended drills in November 2000, then the six months should
begin in December 2000.

If

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to his
further service and crediting of drills.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

a.
he was not discharged
became effective on 7 November 2000.

on 6 November 2000 but a 21 month extension

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
b.
was credited with four paid drills per month for the six months
following his discharge.
November or December, as appropriate.

The six months should begin in either

2

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

C .
naval record.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

wW.

Ex

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04356-00

    Original file (04356-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At enclosure (l), an advisory opinion from the Reserve Affairs Division, Career Management Team (CMT), HQMC, states that at no time did Petitioner request an additional extension to remain in the Marine Corps Reserve until the date gap surrounding the missing fitness report was resolved. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by showing he reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for three years on 15 April 2000 vice the two-year reenlistment on 12 April 2001 now of record. That he be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03672-98

    Original file (03672-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated that since his fitness reports as a lieutenant and captain were sufficiently strong to allow him to have been promoted to major, and since his major reports are “far more competitive, ”the probability of promotion to lieutenant colonel “would be high.” Regarding his fitness report for 15 November 1985 to 28 February 1986, he stated that although it is an “annual” report, it covers only three months, during which the actual observation was only four to six calendar days. In their...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06500-02

    Original file (06500-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was credited with three years of reserve service not shown on his statement of service, that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 9 August 1990, and transferred to the Retired...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-00

    Original file (06028-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As reflected in enclosure record as he requested, but modified it by removing the following RS verbiage: qualified for promotion at this time but.. mark in item 19 from “NA” to “yes.” .” Also, as shown in enclosure (2), the HQMC PERB did not remove this report from Petitioner ’s “He is not (3), they changed the g* The fifth contested fitness report, for 28 June to 20 July 1985 (Tab E), from a third RS, also documents only that the following be deleted from the RS comments: Petitioner Is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05454-02

    Original file (05454-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    application with supporting documents his for removal of the request 118(11) page 11 entry MC0 P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. fitness report that Staff Sergeant to provide counseling for personal and the a page 11 counseling should have no counseling is accomplished to overcome The event, were found in my record, The page 11 entry, not the iciencies. F 118(11) page 11 entry for removal Staff 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00

    Original file (02064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07468-02

    Original file (07468-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Regarding the remaining contested fitness report for 1 November 6 December 1996, Petitioner contends that this report is adverse, but was as it should have been, for the opportunity to make a rebuttal; that the comments and marks are inconsistent; that this report was submitted at the same time as the preceding report at issue, giving him no time to improve; and finally, that this report, in which he was ranked below all six of the other captains compared with him, was an attempt to help the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03181-01

    Original file (03181-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 8 January 1984. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is no explanation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08512-01

    Original file (08512-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record < enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that three anniversary years are qualifying for reserve retirement. proficiency marks, and was awarded the Organized Reserve Medal, it appears that Petitioner probably attended drills during the period at issue. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05208-00

    Original file (05208-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Harrison reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Commandant of the Marine Corps when he requested transfer to He had 20 e. Petitioner became 60 years old on 5 January 2000 and He is now being applied for retired pay on 5 February 2000. paid retired pay in the grade of E.6. the advisory opinions that Petitioner...