Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07771-01
Original file (07771-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

TRG 
Docket No:  7771-01 
10 April 2002 

From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records 
To : 

Secretary of the Navy 

Ref: 

(a) Title 10 U.S.C.  1552 

Encl :  (1) Case Summary 

(2) Subject's  naval record 

1.  Pursuant to the provisions of reference  (a), Petitioner, a 
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps filed an application 
with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show 
that he was reduced in grade from LCPL  (E-3) to PFC  (E-2), vice 
to W T  (E-1) .  He is also requesting a change in the reenlistment 
code. 

2.  The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Brezna and Ms.  Hare, 
reviewed Petitioner's  allegations of error and injustice on 
2 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that 
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the 
available evidence of record.  Documentary material considered by 
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

3.  The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining 
to Petitioner's  allegations of error and injustice, finds as 
follows: 

a.  Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all 

administrative remedies available under existing law and 
regulations within the Department of the Navy. 

b.  Petitioner's  application was filed in a timely manner. 

c.  Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 August 

1997 at age 21.  Subsequently, he was advanced to LCPL.  On 31 
January 2000 he received nonjudicial punishment  (NJP) for use of 
marijuana.  The punishment imposed included restriction, extra 
duty, forfeitures of pay and a reduction in rank to W T .   Because 
of the drug use, he was processed for an administrative 
discharge. In connection with this processing, he elected to 
waive the right to have his case heard by an administrative 
discharge board.  After review the discharge authority directed 
discharge under other than honorable conditions and he was so 
discharged on 29 March 2000.  At  t h a t :   time, he was  hot 

recommended for reenlistment and was assigned an RE-4B 
reenlistment code. 

d.  Attached to enclosure  (1) is an advisory opinion from 

Headquarters Marine Corps  (HQMC) which states that Petitioner was 
improperly reduced from LCPL to W T  because only a one pay grade 
reduction is authorized at an NJP.  HQMC recommendS that the 
record be corrected to show that on 31 January 2000, he was 
reduced from LCPL to PFC.  Concerning the reenlistment code 
issue, the advisory opinion points outs that the regulations 
authorized the assignment of an RE-4B  reenlistment code to an 
individual with a record of inservice drug abuse and no potential 
for further service.  Accordingly, HQMC recommends that the 
reenlistment code not be changed. 

CONCLUSION: 

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the 
Board concludes that Petitioner's  request warrants favorable 
action.  Since only a one pay grade reduction is authorized at 
NJP,  the Board agrees with the advisory opinion that the record 
should be corrected to show that at the 31 January 2000 NJP, he 
was reduced from LCPL to PFC vice being reduced to W T .  

Concerning the reenlistment code issue, the Board notes that the 
RE-4B  reenlistment code is authorized by regulation and is 
normally assigned when an individual is discharged because of 
drug abuse.  Since Petitioner has been treated no differently 
than others discharged by reason of drug abuse, the Board 
concludes that there was no error or injustice in the assignment 
of the RE-4B  reenlistment code. 

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings 
should be filed in Petitioner's  naval record so that all future 
reviewers will understand that he was only reduced one pay grade 
at the 31 January 2000 NJP. 

RECOMMENDATION : 

a.  That Petitioner's  naval record be corrected to show that 
at the NJP of 31 January 2000 he was reduced in grade from LCPL 
to PFC vice the reduction to W T  now of record. 

b.  That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's 
naval record. 

4 .   It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's 
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and 

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled 
matter. 

ROBERT D. ZS- 
Recorder 

Acting Recorder 

5.  Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of 
Naval Records  (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) 
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby 
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the 
authority of reference  (a), has been approved by  the Board on 
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. 

Executive Di 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06621-00

    Original file (06621-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that on 19 June 2000 he was reduced to PFC (E-2) vice PVT (E-l). He was discharged under on 10 July 2000. on file in the record provided However, a e. At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which commanding officer was not authorized to reduce him two pay grades...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07426-00

    Original file (07426-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) HQMC Memo 1070 JAM4 of 13 Feb 01 (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that on 22 December 1999 he was reduced to PFC (E-2) vice PVT (E-l). The Board is aware that commanding officers at NJP only RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07545-06

    Original file (07545-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 November 1988 Petitioner received NJP for wrongful use of cocaine during the period from 1 to 31 July 1988. On 10 December 1988 Petitioner’s commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by the positive urinalysis for cocaine. Accordingly, the Board believes that Petitioner’s NJP, imposed on 20 November 1988, should be removed from the record, and that the record should also be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-01

    Original file (02737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2002 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams and Harrison and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02198-02

    Original file (02198-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged on 31 December 2001 or any other date. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04163-01

    Original file (04163-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, given the circumstances, especially his fine performance of duty, the Board concludes that an RE-1 reenlistment code should be assigned in this case as an exception to policy. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 24 July 2000 he was assigned an RE-1 reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00839-02

    Original file (00839-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 839-02 25 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01374-99

    Original file (01374-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Since the NJP appeal was approved, Petitioner is requesting that all documentation concerning the NJP be removed from his record. f. At enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which notes that the NJP entries were made in accordance with regulations and the entries properly set forth the fact that the appeal was approved. Accordingly, the Board concludes that all documentation concerning the NJP of 18 November 1998 and the appeal should be removed from both...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02565-99

    Original file (02565-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, regret for the actions which led to your discharge, the letters of reference attesting to your academic achievements since your discharge, and the fact that it has been nearly 16 years since you were discharged. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05733-03

    Original file (05733-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colonel request for the removal of her failure of selection to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. we furnished her with a copy of the Advisory Opinion Head, performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I i E A O Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 R U S S E L L R O A D Q U A N T I C O . Per the reference, we reviewed...