Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00
Original file (07662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 766240
20 March 2001

.

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 SER 
copy of which is attached.

N130C3/01UlOl of 13 March 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

/EPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

S

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

N

0

IN 

TO

RfyjJEFER 
Ser 
13 Mar 2001

N130C3/01~101

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

IONS ICO

(a) Electronic Military Personnel Records System(EMPRS-98)
(b) DODFMR Volume  

7A, Chapter 26, Feb   00

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#07662-00 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive pay for

2.
Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for San
Clemente, CA (dependent location) vice Camp Pendleton, CA (duty
station).

CA to NAVHOSP Camp Pendleton, CA

A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner

3.
executed a Permanent Change Station (PCS) move from  
FMF PAC Camp Pendleton,
(proximity move) effective 15 May 98 and was authorized BAH at
the w/o dependent rate for duty station.
NAVPERS 602R (page  
Clemente, CA after getting married on 16  
(b) Table 26-9, Rule 1, Note l(e), BAH based on dependent
location is authorized when in receipt of PCS orders between duty
stations in the same proximity that as a result disadvantage the
member and movement of household goods (HHG) is not authorized.

2), the petitioner moved from  

Per reference (a)

lSt Mar Div

Ott 99.

Hemet, CA to San
IAW reference

The petitioner is not eligible for BAH at dependent

4.
The provision for close proximity move waivers exists
location.
for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with
a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when
the member did not move dependents.
In this case, the members
duty stations were both located at Camp Pendleton, CA therefore
the BAH rate would be the same.
disapproval of the petitioner's

N130C recommends
W reference  
(k).

Therefore 

Assistant Head, Pay and

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07440-98

    Original file (07440-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. DC 20350-200 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 722 0 Ser 30 Mar 99 N130C3/062_gg MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02

    Original file (05603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09157-07

    Original file (09157-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9157-07 16 Jun 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07697-01

    Original file (07697-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner accepted this assignment with the d. Petitioner tried repeatedly to get his orders modified assigning him to Camp Pendleton so that he would be entitled to payment of BAH for Camp Pendleton. Twentynine Palms and Camp Pendleton is as follows: The BAH comparison rate for cy 2000 2001 2002 Twentvnine Palms Cp Pendleton Difference $499.70 $576.70 $637.70 $833.70 $$1,032.70 $$1,244.70 $334.00 $456.00 $607.70 Petitioner has been working and living in the Camp Pendleton area and has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07669-10

    Original file (07669-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 EC Doc No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty station (PDS) based on a close proximity permanent change of station (PCS) move. The orders...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05159-02

    Original file (05159-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7200 Ser which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02

    Original file (05929-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08239-06

    Original file (08239-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8239-06 1 Nov 06Dear Petty Officer:This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8079 14

    Original file (NR8079 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR8OT79-14 22 Jul 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD _ICO Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference fa) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to conus Cost of living Allowance (CONUS COLA), and adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH)...