DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S
2 N A V Y A N N E X
W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 7770-01
9 April 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pitrsuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 April 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with adn~inistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Docu~iientary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all niaterial subniitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC ~nemorandu~ii 1160 Pers 81 1 of 31 January 2002, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the com~nents contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL P E R S O N N E L
5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY D R I V E
M I L L I N G T O N T N 3 8 0 5 5 - 0 0 0 0
I N R E P L Y R E F E R TO
1160
PERS-811
31 Jan 02
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-OOZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO CT02
Ref:
(a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 05 Oct 01
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the
petitioner's request.
2. The petitioner reenlisted early on 29 September 2001 for four
years at the request of the Navy. His EAOS at the time was 26
October 2001.
3. The petitioner was paid his full 48 months of SRB. Although
the petitioner did reenlist one month early, the OPINS system was
over-ridden and the month was not deducted from his SRB
computation.
4. In view of the above, recommend disapproval of the
petitioner's request.
5. This is an advisory memo
Board for Correction of Naval R
is returned.
(a) for use by the
only. Enclosure (1)
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06337-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to receive the additional award level for the LSRB UIC 44321. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for' the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01678-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03370-99
Documentary material consider by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support t ereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference b) did not carry a zone "C" SRB entitlement for the AT(0000) ate at the time petitioner reenlisted. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenl stment date of 06 Mar 98 and effect a reenlistment on 01 May 99 nd receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement in reference (c) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08536-01
A three-member panel of rhe Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consitleretl your application 011 18 June 2002. I n addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientioi~s consideration of the entire record, h e Board found that the evidence subn~itted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or I n this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the co~nnients contained in ili.justice. This is an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03422-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1160 is attached. - Petitioner requests to expunge reenlistment date of 07 Dec 96 and effect a 7 month extension to his P3D of July 1997.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08260-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.