Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07730-01
Original file (07730-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 7730-01
14 November 2001

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

FORMER
REVIEW

GO
(1)
(2)

10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149
Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to
show that she was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the code of RE-4 she
was assigned on 30 July 1998.

Mazza reviewed Petitioner’s
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hogue, Kastner and 
allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies:

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

‘available  under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

C. Petitioner served in the Navy on from 8 to 30 July 1998, when she was discharged

for failure to meet medical/physical standards for enlistment, due to asthma. She was
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4, as required by governing directives. On 27 June
2001, she was evaluated by a pulmonary specialist, who determined that there was no clinical
evidence of asthma at that time..
In his opinion, she may have had bronchial hyperactivity in
the past as demonstrated in a methacholine study, but this did not necessarily equate to
clinical asthma. He cleared her from a medical standpoint to reenlist in the Navy.

d. SECNAVINST 1900.8 provides, in effect, that Sailors discharged for failing to meet

procurement medical/physical standards will be assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Those
discharged because of erroneous enlistment may be assigned a code of RE-4 or 
RE-3E, in the
discretion of the commanding officer.

e.

Petitioner contends that the condition which resulted in his discharge does not exist,

and that she wants to be eligible for reenlistment.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board was not persuaded
that Petitioner ’s discharge by reason of her failure to meet minimum physical standards was
erroneous.
It concludes, however, that the assignment of the stigmatizing reenlistment code
of RE-4 is unjust. Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 30 July 1998, she was
discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3E.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807325

    Original file (NC9807325.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7325-98 16 July 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 4% Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Based on the doctors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_16_49 CDT 2000

    c. age 20. doctor notes that “this condition was not correctable to meet Navy standards” and recommended administrative separation. Therefore, the Board concludes that the RE-4 Additionally, there is no However, the Board This code will alert recruiters that 2 The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future reviewers will be aware of the diagnosis of asthma and understand the reason for the change in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04585-01

    Original file (04585-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 13 October 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01756-09

    Original file (01756-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting hER naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 January 2009. The Board, consisting of Mr - ieee, Mr. im and Ms. WME ceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08112-00

    Original file (08112-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 8112-00 19 July 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. An RE-3E reenlistment code is authorized when an individual is separated because he or she was enlisted in error. and may no longer have his Since the regulation does This code will The Board further concludes that this Report of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02126-01

    Original file (02126-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 March 1998. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice personality disorder. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she received an entry level...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03031-01

    Original file (03031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 she received on 2 March 1999. d. SECNAVINST 1900.8 provides, in effect, that Sailors discharged for failing to meet procurement medical/physical standards will be assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. CONCLUSION: Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08325-01

    Original file (08325-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a more favorable reenlistment code than the RE-4 code he received on 20 April 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner and Rothlein and Ms. Schnittman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08684-01

    Original file (08684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NAVY WASHINGTON DC 2 ANNEX DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 8684-01 8 February 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Kim, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07200-06

    Original file (07200-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    e. Regulations allow for the assignment of his RE-3E reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. When an individual is discharged by reason of “Failed Medical Physical Procurement Standards” the only authorized code is an RE-4 reenlistment code.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action. This code will alert recruiters that there is a problem which...