DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JREZ
Docket No: 7694-00
4 April 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 March
200 1. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this regard, the Board noted that DOD Directive 6130.5, which contains the
physical standards for enlistment in the armed forces, provides that primary, secondary or
pre-glaucoma, as evidenced by intraocular pressure
(Hg), or
higher, are disqualifying for military service. You were discharged after completing 2
IOPs were measured at 23 and 26mm Hg. The
months and 26 days of service because your
fact that you had lower IOP readings following your discharge does not demonstrate that the
higher readings obtained while you were in the Navy are erroneous. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
(IOP) of 2 lmm of mercury
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07500-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board particularly noted that you did not appeal the NJP and did not provide proof of the “administrative actions” used to remove it from your SRB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04765-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01640-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06929-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. In this vegqard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08355-01
In this regard, the E3oard noted that the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty, whereas the military departments rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty. The Board concluded that had the PEB had found your arthritis to be unfitting as of 1 October 1994, it is unlikely that you would have received a substantial rating for that condition, because substantial deductions would have been taken from the rating for...
Disqualification for worldwide service and continued active duty occurs if the diastolic pressure is consistently more than 110mm Hg following an adequate period of therapy in an ambulatory status. Standards for enlistment in the USAFR require a 5-day blood pressure reading to be recorded. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06476-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2010. The fact that the VA assigned a disability rating that is higher than the rating assigned by the Department of the Navy is insufficient to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, especially since the basis for the VA rating is unclear In the absence of evidence which establishes that you were entitled to a rating of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5036 14
Your application Ciditin, “Se ReGaets soo, T siqned a 1070/613 (Page 13) and also updated the system to transfer my POST 9-11 GI Bill entitlements to my dependents. pr-9> ac transferability request: anda 2, Complete e-ectron-c <= election using TEE.” The Board members furzher founc onlv change which occurred to the program, occurred w portal during affect the databases that contained the have not submitted any proof contrary to the Board members took into consideration, that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05882-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that any of the additional conditions rated by the VA rendered you unfit to reasonably perform your Military duties, and that you were entitled to a combined rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07914-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Board determined that photographs of your knee taken on 17 July 2003 are not probative of your contention that you should have received a higher disability rating when you were discharged from the Navy on 4 November...