NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02027-01
Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the injustice. On 30 September 1986, you in connection with your pre-separation physical examination. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02033-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02036-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence: of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02037-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 2037-01 14 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlememt to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02039-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the most favorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02039-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AE rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Milner, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02040-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse under the insurable interest category, and when eligible elected former spouse coverage under the spouse category. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02041-01
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the record and 02 USMC He petitioned the porting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990731. requests removal of his failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board He failed selection He petitioned the (PERB) for removal of the rting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990630. equests removal of his failures of selection. Head, Personnel Management Support was removed from the OMPF on 5 October emphatically states that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02043-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. CODE 5294, 10% UNDER CODE 8520, AND 10% UNDER CODE 65 19 FOR A TOTAL RATING OF 34% ROUNDED TO 30% FOR THE DIAGNOSES: USN(RET) WITH ABOUT 5 AND TDRL ON 24 FEBRUARY 1995 ‘/2 YEARS OF (2) STATUS POST LEFT RADIUS FRACTURE WITH...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02044-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. on 9 March 1969, you were On 15 December 1969 you received NJP for a two pay period punishment imposed was restriction for seven days and You were sentenced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02045-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The punishment imposed was Your record further reflects that during the period from 2 May to 14 July 1982 you were in a UA status on three occasions for a total of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02046-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board did not consider your request for further consideration of your previous request for correction of your record to show that you were retired under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority, or that you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02047-01
Subject,enlisted in the Naval Reserve Force on 4 October On 8 January 1918 he was discharged from that component to 1917. enlist in the Regular manner for about 10 by a summary hours. The At that time he was record shows that he left: the United States on 13 January 1944. b. naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02049-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your resignation from the Naval Reserve. Your orders were canceled on 28 On 21 September 1951 you submitted About seven weeks later On 18 March In your application, you are requesting that your status be However,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02050-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02052-01
Documentary material considered by the Board A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02058-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02060-00
On 3 January 1959 you received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty. thereafter, on 27 February 1959, you were convicted by SCM of The punishment imposed was reduction to - absence from your appointed place of duty and were sentenced to hard labor for 35 days. concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your discharge given your frequent misconduct, which resulted in nine NJPs and two court-martial convictions, and since your conduct average was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02062-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. place of duty on five occasions, order on three occasions, After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02063-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2063-01 4 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl : (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Beckett, Pfeiffer, and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 2 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02072-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the AME rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02073-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02073-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 20 November 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an undesirable discharge on 29 September 1961. these factors were not sufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02074-00
record (page 9) shows that for the period 11 March 1994 to 31 January 1995, you received an overall 3.6 performance evaluation. for the reenlistment of individuals who are discharged from the TDRL if they are otherwise qualified. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02077-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02080-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02082-01
application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 4 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Per the reference, the CRCR was in error and has been corrected.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02085-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. were sentenced to a $378 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 60 days, and reduction to Your record further reflects that on 24 March 1984 you received NJP for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02088-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Hardbower, Newman, and Mr. Geisler, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02089-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 28 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and.procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02090-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to’a zone 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02094-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the single rate. McCormick, Wiley, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02098-00
Your request to enter a “CD” (change of duty) fitness report for 9 March to 10 April 1991, reflecting service in combat with the primary duty of adjutant, could not be considered, as you did not provide such a report. the Reporting Senior's actions in 3c is in no way an invalidating factor in Reference (b) did not contain a very filling out Item 3c and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02102-01
DEPdRTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOq CORRECTION OF NAJAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W 4SHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 2102-01 11 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : FORMER I_l‘.7 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 - Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board rquesting, in show that he was assigned a reenlistment code which will permit re’erence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work orders with less than 24 hours...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02107-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 7 July 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer was denied the opportunity to compete 3 for advancement in examination cycle 168, September 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02109-01
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by changing the 4 reenlistment code issued on 19 April 1985. f. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged because of parenthood. adverse performance the Board concludes that no it is clear that the parenthood Given the circumstances, Although his command This code will The Board further concludes that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02115-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board rejected your contention to the effect that you are entitled to disability separation or retirement because you suffer from a disqualifying condition listed in the Manual of the Medical Department (MANMED),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02116-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02119-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02121-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02122-01
2 October 2001. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a change in the characterization of your service because of your failure to complete recruit training and your defective attitude. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02125-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. circumstances...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02125-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. leadership and supervisory During your second tour you On 21 January 1971 you received a The record shows that on 16 February 1971 You were You were Character of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02126-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 March 1998. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment vice personality disorder. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she received an entry level...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02128-00
When the fraud was discovered you were processed for an You were issued an undesirable The records you submitted show that on 10 July 2001, the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri issued you certification of military service which shows that you served in the Marine Corps from 29 April 1967 until you were issued an honorable discharge on 20 June 1970. of this document is unknown since the available records clearly show that you received a bad conduct discharge on 23...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02130-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02131-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 June 1979 you During the period from 22 July 1979 to 26 August 1980 you were in a UA status on five occasions for a total of 272 days. materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy periods of UA, and your request for...