DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
15 March 2001
2074-00
Dear
*
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 March 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application ,.together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record shows that you reported to the USS NIMITZ
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 May 1992 at
age 23.
(CVN 68) on 29 August 1992 and served aboard for about 18 months.
During this period you were advanced to AN (E-3).
1994 you reported to a naval hospital, apparently for an
evaluation of your medical condition.
record (page 9) shows that for the period 11 March 1994 to 31
January 1995, you received an overall 3.6 performance evaluation.
On 31 January 1995 you transferred to the Temporary Disability
Retired List
(SPD)
code of SFK.
code.
(TDRL) with a Separation Program Designator
At that time you were assigned an RE-2 reenlistment
On 11 March
The enlisted performance
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-2 reenlistment code
when an individual is transferred to the TDRL with an SPD of SFK.
An RE-2 reenlistment code is not considered to be derogatory and
only reflects your status on the TDRL.
Although your record is
incomplete, the Board assumed that you have been discharged from
the TDRL because you were found fit for duty.
for the reenlistment of individuals who are discharged from the
TDRL if they are otherwise qualified.
If you were discharged
with severance pay or medically retired, you must convince
Regulations allow
recruiting authorities that you are qualified and should be
Since you have been treated no differently than
enlisted.
in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice
in the assignment of the RE-2 reenlistment code.
others
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-094
through the issuance of a DD Form 215: CGPC recommended that the Board grant the following partial relief to the applicant • That Item 13 of the DD Form 214 be corrected to show that the applicant earned the “Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation” and the “Coast Guard “E” Ribbon.” • That Item 23 of the DD Form 214 be corrected to show that the applicant was discharged instead of retired. Training Center APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 14, 2008, a copy of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081390C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated from active duty because of a disability and as such, was not eligible to reenlist, and received an SPD code of SFK and an RE code of 4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075170C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated from active duty because of disability and as such, he was not eligible to reenlist, and received an SPD code of SFK and an RE code of 4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059478C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In view of the fact that the applicant was permanently retired by reason of physical disability, the assigned reentry code of 4 and the related nonwaivable disqualification for enlistment was and still is appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009006C070208
The applicant requests that his RE (Reentry code) 4 on his 1991 separation document be corrected to an RE code which would permit him to reenlist. His separation document indicates that the applicant received an “RE-4” when he was discharged in 1991 and his separation code was recorded as “SFK.” 4. Pertinent Army regulations also provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074842C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code and his separation (SPD) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected so that he can reenlist in the Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Nevertheless, the applicant was separated from active duty in July 1992...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011223
The regulation shows that the SPD code SFK as shown on the applicants DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for separation as Disability, Temporary." The applicant contends that he never received an updated DD Form 214 when he was removed from the TDRL and that his SPD code and RE code should be changed so he can rejoin the military. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007323C070206
Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes), then in effect, prescribes the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010085
His record contains a signed copy of the 2009 PEB and other documentation which shows that after a review of his most recent periodic medical examination he was still determined to be unfit for military service and as a result his name was removed from the TDRL and he was discharged for physical disability, rated 10% disabled. Army Regulation 601-210 also states that former enlisted members who do not enlist in their respective component within 90 days of removal from the TDRL must meet all...