Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02104-00
Original file (02104-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 

2037~5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 2 104-00
24 October 2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 October 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted   in support thereof,   your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 N  
of which is attached.

13OC3/OUO498  of 2 1 September 2000, a copy

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF

  THE  CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

N

OF  THE NAV

Y

S

0

N130C3/OU0498
21 Sep 2000

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj :

Ref:

Encl:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
FMR MBR

, USN

(a) PH
MS

w and DFAS-CL (ADSW Section)

(DK2 
of 24 May 2000

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#02104-00 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request, the following recommendation concerning

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

2.
Enclosure (1) indicates a request to reinstate all pay and
allowances due to a negative leave balance that occurred during
the petitioner's continuation of active duty for special work
orders with less than 24 hours between active duty periods.

3.
A review of enclosure (1) revealed that the petitioner had
two sets of orders for active duty for special work from (1 Jun
99 to 1 Nov 99) and (2 Nov 99 to 31 Mar 00).
for this period of active duty would be 25 days.
Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) shows two leave periods were
taken (13 
total of 25 days.
negative leave balance was created due to an administrative error
made before his second set of active duty orders went into
effect.
00 to correct the negative leave balance per reference (a).

After the first leave period was charged, a

Corrections were made to his account in  

Ott 99) and (17 Mar 00 to 23 Mar 00) for a

His leave balance

Dee 99 and Jan

Ott 99 to 30 

A review of his

A review of MMPA leave section revealed that the petitioner

4.
was on leave from 17 Mar to 23 Mar 00.
have brought his leave balance to zero at separation.
late posting of this leave to his MMPA caused an erroneous
payment of 4.5 days of LSL,
amount of $384.13 at separation on 31 Mar 00.

resulting in an overpayment in the

This leave period should

However a

N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner's request to

5.
restore all pay and allowances and advises the petitioner to make
arrangement for restitution in the amount of $384.12 to the U.S.
Government.

1

.

c

+%
/

S J. Miller
Assistant Head, Pay and

I

-0 &A

Allowances Section  

(N130C)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98

    Original file (05622-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08310-00

    Original file (08310-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 13 March 2001 831040 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02

    Original file (00167-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03407-01

    Original file (03407-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3407-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title IJnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. 30 October 200 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01815-01

    Original file (01815-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 12 June 2001 1815-01 This is in reference to your applic provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. r correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 200 1. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07662-00

    Original file (07662-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. for a member who executes a no-cost move from a duty station with a higher BAH rate to a duty station with a lower BAH rate, when the member did not move dependents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06982-01

    Original file (06982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 6982-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01292-01

    Original file (01292-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: ddj Docket No: 1292-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08

    Original file (05377-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...