DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
ELP
Docket No. 2039-00
22 August 2000
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 August 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious considerationof the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on
2 November 1992 for four years as a PFC (E-2).
reflects that you were advanced to LCPL (E-3), received a
meritorious mast, and had no disciplinary actions during your
You were honorably discharged on 5 January
period of service.
1994 by reason of physical disability and assigned an RE-3P
The facts and circumstances surrounding your
reenlistment code.
disability were not in the records made available for the Board's
review.
The record
An RE-3P reenlistment code means that an individual has failed to
meet physical/medical standards but is recommended for
reenlistment except for the disqualifying factor which led to
discharge.
or Reserve Officer Training Corps officials if they can be
-
convinced the medical condition which led to discharge no longer
exists.
rests with the branch of service in which an application for
However, the authority to waive a reenlistment code
This reenlistment code might be waived by recruiting
reenlistment is made and not with this Board.
the most favorable reenlistment code authorized for the reason
you were discharged and were treated no differently than others
separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no
error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Since you received
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01636-00
You were honorably discharged on You state in your application that your knee has healed and you desire to reenlist. In support of your case, you have submitted Regulations only allow for the assignment of an RE-3P or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06763-00
were so separated on 21 July 2000. assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. The Board noted that the evidence in your Marine Corps record was sufficient to refute the conclusion of your psychologist that you are qualified to serve in the military. the evidence-f your poor adjustment in recruit training and your admission to a fraudulent enlistment were sufficient to support separation from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01948-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03484-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. questioned the authority of seniors all of which were inconsistent On 11 August 2000 the GCMCA reviewed your case and directed an honorable discharge and assignment of an RE-3G reenlistment code. While Marine Corps regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P reenlistment code to Marines...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13
Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11272 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06073-01
The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical disability. thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your Accordingly, your application has been reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08695-05
08695-05 6 November 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your navalrecord pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, consideredyour application on 26 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted insupport thereof, yournaval recordandapplicable statutes,...