DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
BJG
Docket No: 2082-01
28 June 2001
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested promotion
reconsideration for the Fiscal Year (FY) 1997 and 1998 Marine Corps Reserve Lieutenant
Colonel Selection Boards.
application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 June 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 4 May 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion concerning the FY 1997 selection board, and they found this opinion
equally applicable to the FY 1998 board.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
In this
and material evidence
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
oy,other matter not previously considered by the Board.
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
‘
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1600
CMT
4 May 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR
CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
ON BCNR APPLICATION; CASE
Ref: (a) Memo from MAG-42 dtd
3/7/01
1. Recomme
following justification is provided.
quest to remove his failure of selection be denied. The
est to remove his failure of selection is based on the fact that the
did not have access to his accurate
fically, at the time of the FY97 boa
showed four unsatisfactory years from 1994-1997. Per the reference, the CRCR was in
error and has been corrected.
Althou
RCR was inaccurate at the time of the FY97 promotion
3.
board, it must be noted that the CRCR is not the only tool used by the promotion board.
The officer ’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and Master Brief
primary sources of
military record sho
question. It is unlikely tha
inaccurate CRCR
period.
lection process. A review
s that cover the entire
iiure of selection was a result of an
ows his performance during the four-year
four-
ess reports are competitive. However, his record does show
4.
significant trends in the areas of additional duties, force and economy of management.
In addition, there are date gaps in his record that total 3 years and 10 months. These date
gaps occurred during 1982, 1986-1988 and 1993. These factors could cause his record to
appear less than competitive to a promotion board.
e above information, there is no compelling reason to re
of selection.
*
6. Point of
conta
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05613-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 11 August 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA-4), dated 10 August 1998, a copy of which is attached, and the Master Brief Sheets, providrd by MMOA-4, of officers considered by the FY 1996 and 1997 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards (five selectees...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08069-00
not go before the Board. his record. uone of one" rating provides However, a The inclusion of this fitness report would likely The first missing fitness report in question (960401-970331) 2. was a favorable report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05326-01
That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing his failures by the FY 1996 and 1997 Major Selection Boards. 's record and his FY-96 and FY-97 920528. Point of contact Major, U.S. Marine Corps Head, Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section Officer Assignment Branch Personnel Management Division DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS D 3280 RUSSELL ROA QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1600 MMOA-4 14 Aug 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 12_56_13 CDT 2000
In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Promotion Branch (MMPR) has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s implied request to remove his failures of selection has merit and warrants favorable action, since the GCM documentation was not removed until after he had failed by the FY 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board. Warrant Office~~ request the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) to remove his failures of selection for the FY97 and FY99 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Selection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08227-01
DEPARTMENT OF THF NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 8227-01 16 November 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: L T REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD , USM Refi (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06620-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Captain Selection Board; returning him to the Regular Marine Corps effective 1 November 1999; and changing the date of rank and effective date of his promotion to captain to reflect selection by the FY 1999 Captain Selection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00878-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer-3 (CWO-3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 CWO-3 Selection Board. &rt in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05329-01
Your last request was not considered, as you have not been selected for or promoted to lieutenant colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reportin gSenio r Period of Report 11 Apr 00 There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to record and e FY02 USMC remove the To He successfully...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06470-00
Your request for a special selection board was not considered, as you were selected by the FY 02 promotion board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They noted that according to paragraph 3 of this opinion, your fitness report for 1 October 1998 to 31 October 1999 was missing from your record when you were considered by the...