Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02080-01
Original file (02080-01.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX
      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100    LCC:lc
            Docket No: 2080-0 1
            25 April 2001

   From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
   To:      Secretary of the Navy






   End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
         (2)     Series of Documents
         (3)     Subject’s naval record

   1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter
   referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
   requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to
   advanced when first eligible.

   2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed
   Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and,
   pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
   indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record.
   Documentary material ‘considered by the Board consisted of the
   enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
   policies.

   3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
   Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

      a.    Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
   administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
   within the Department of the Navy.

      b.    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
   cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
   has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
   favorable action.

   CONCLUSION

   Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
   especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the
   existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
Ref:  (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

   a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-2 effective 7 February 2000.

   b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s
   naval record.

4.    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      G. L. ADAMS
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


         25 April 2001


                                                                    NJ

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05050-01

    Original file (05050-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02806-02

    Original file (02806-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sul~ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosi~re (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~ijustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04902-01

    Original file (04902-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05335-01

    Original file (05335-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 25 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05002-01

    Original file (05002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 25 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05196-01

    Original file (05196-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 25 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04825-01

    Original file (04825-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Pfeiffer, Shy, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner 3 error and injustice on 21 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 482501 a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 April...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03285-01

    Original file (03285-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01793-01

    Original file (01793-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Neuschafer, and Ms. Davies, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06600-01

    Original file (06600-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 December 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...