DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NA\AL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
6 June 2001
2125-01
applicat:Lon for correction of your
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 May 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
During your first tour, you
re'ceived nonjudicial
The record shows that you served in Vietnam from
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 November 1968
24
at age 20.
July 1969 to 7 April 1970 and from 14 October 1970 to 20 April
1971.
On 20
punishment (NJP) for disrespect and sleeping on post.
February 1970 you received a performance evaluation with adverse
marks of 2.6 in military behavior,
ability, and military appearance.
received NJP for disobedience.
performance evaluation with adverse marks of 1.0 in professional
performance, leadership and supervisory ability; an adverse mark
and adverse marks in several other
of 2.0 in military behavior;
evaluation categories.
a recommendation for advancement in rate was withdrawn.
released from active duty on 30 April 1971 with your service
characterized as being under honorable conditions.
subsequently issued a general discharge at the end of your
military obligation.
leadership and supervisory
During your second tour you
On 21 January 1971 you received a
The record shows that on 16 February 1971
You were
You were
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
were 2.6 and 2.75, respectively.
in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a
fully honorable characterization of service.
Your conduct and overall trait averages
A minimum average mark of 3.0
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, limited
education and your contention, in effect, that your problems
occurred because you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD).
The Board found that these factors and contentions were
recharacterl.zation of your discharge
not sufficient to warrant
given your disciplinary record and
required average mark in conduct.
record, and you have submitted none,
from PTSD while in Vietnam or that you were not otherwise
The Board
responsible for your actions while in the Navy.
concluded that the release from active duty under honorable
conditions on release and the general discharge were proper and
no change is warranted.
fa:.lure to achieve the
There is no evidence in the
to show that you suffered
Concerning your request for advancement to E02, the Board noted
that you were recommended for advancement on 20 January 1971 but
the recommendation was withdrawn on 16 February 1971.
Regulations require that in addition
individual complete all of the other
and still be recommended on the
There is no evidence in the record
other requirements for advancement and you were not recommended
for advancement after 16 February
you did not qualify for advancement and there is no basis to
correct the record to show advancement to E02.
autho:rized advancement date.
'~0 being recommended, an
requirements for advancement
thiat you completed any of the
197:L.
The Board concluded that
Finally, there is no evidence in the record, and you have
submitted none, to show that you qualified for the expert
marksmanship ribbon.
ribbon can be issued administratively by the custodian of your
record and action by this Board on
However, if you have such evidence, that
th.is issue is not required.
Accordingly, your application has
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
been denied.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
YO,J are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
kelap in mind that a
2
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error
or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08750-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08518-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. This man shows evidence of an antisocial personality disorder of moderate severity which existed prior to enlistment, and certainly makes him unsuitable for continued Naval Service. Minimum average marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 in overall traits were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06297-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2001. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacteri- zation of your discharge given your record of three NJPs and special court-martial conviction, and your failure to achieve the required averages in military behavior and overall traits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07974-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 1993. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After an evaluation, the diagnosis was personality." The Board also noted the comments by the CO in which he stated that you attempted suicide in 1987 and again in 1990, and on 16 April 1992 you stated that you were going to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01233-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08262-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show an honorable discharge and an RE-1 reenlistment code. He refused Captain's Mast The Board met on 17 The performance evaluation Petitioner received from the TEMDU command, for the period 24 April to 24 November 2000, is also...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03853-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Characterization of service is based in part on your conduct mark average computed from marks assigned on a periodic basis.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808697
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05486-99
Reenlistme On 31 OCT 64, Review of medical record reveals initial normal physical exam The patient presented with complaints of anxiety on 4. on 15 MAR 62. His active duty behavior (related to what and The tremor, would now be diagnosed as a personality disorder). has been diagnosed as an initially felt to be related to anxiety, Therefore, I essential tremor and th recommend that former character of the discharge to request for change of the "medical" be denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07314-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your military behavior and overall At the time of on military behavior and In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, limited...