DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 2119-01
9 August 2001
Dears
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On
In addition you were given a poor rating in six of
You enlisted in the Navy on 21 March 2000 at age 20.
1May
2000 you were diagnosed with alcohol dependence and a personality
disorder.
eight evaluation categories concerning your performance in
recruit training.
an administrative separation.
processing, you elected to waive your procedural rights.
May 2000 the separation authority directed an entry level
separation by reason of erroneous entry due to alcohol abuse and
you were so separated on
recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
Based on the diagnoses, you were processed for
17.May 2000.
At that time you were not
In connection with this
On 11
In your application you state that you made false statements
while in recruit training.
is well settled in the law that an individual who perpetrates a
fraud in order to be separated from the military should not
benefit from that fraud when its is discovered.
However, the Board is aware that it
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment
Since you have been treated no differently
due to alcohol abuse.
than others separated for that reason,
the Board could not find
an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment
code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03437-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychiatrist anti- On 24 September 1996 you were notified of separation processing by reason of personality disorder, fraudulent enlistment, erroneous enlistment and alcohol rehabilitation failure. that you would be an outstanding member of the military and recommended that your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00514-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. You were so discharged on 24 April 2000. Reglations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individual separated by reason erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03411-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, the Board Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment, and such a code is normally assigned when the underlying reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05255-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 September 1998 at age 21. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07609-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further, the Board could not tell if you The Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment and such a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02685-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. no differently than others discharged under similar circum- stances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04688-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Prior to separation, you acknowledged On 8 November 2000, the separation You were so separated Since you have been treated no differently than Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04735-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 July 2006. A psychiatric evaluation conducted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05792-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07021-00
on 14 December 1999. and admitted to using alcohol 650 times and marijuana 1900 times. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated from Navy recruit training due to In addition such a code is assigned when an drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.