DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 2050-01
23 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 12 October 2001.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served in the Navy from 15 March 1963 to 28 June 1965, when
you were discharged by reason of unsuitability because of a schizoid personality. Although a
schizoid personality is a mental disorder, it is developmental condition not considered a
disability under the laws administered by the Department of the Navy or the Department of
Veterans Affairs. Given the nature of your disorder, your discharge is considered
“administrative” rather than “medical”. Accordingly, there is no basis for correcting your
record to show that you were separated or retired by reason of physical disability, and your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07597-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, on 3 October 1990 you received an At that time you were assigned a reenlistment A psychiatric conducted on 22 June 1990, found that you had a post traumatic stress disorder, and The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03933-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitkd in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In any event, as you were discharged from the Marine Corps on 23 October 1970, by reason of unfitness, you would not have been entitled to disability evaluation even if you had suffered from a condition considered disabling by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04738-01
The Petitioner appears to have suffered clinically from a Schizoid Personality Disorder since childhood, Paranoid Schizophrenia approximately eight years after his administrative separation from the Navy via a Board of Medical Survey. was admitted to Navy station Hospital tarily had not talked or moved secondary to not wanting #3002. and that the best diagnosis for his difficulties at this time is that of bipolar disorder, mixed type.” Dr. Plattner also noted that the veteran is “severely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03469-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02055-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies,After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02012-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You were discharged by reason of unsuitability/personality disorder on 19 October 1979. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08638-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental disorder which rendered you unfit for duty at the time of your discharge in 1964, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08672-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05030-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful andconscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 1974. You were discharged from the Navy by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02162-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...