NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-00
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Lightle and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In response to enclosure (2), Petitioner submitted a lengthy personal statement concerning his condition and its effects on his performance of duty and ability to adjust, as well as medical records which indicate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-01
15 December 1998 and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. You were honorably discharged on Incident to your The Board also noted your contentions that the medical incident was a transient The Board noted the letters of Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01886-00
Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. b. The case is forwarded for fin Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Director Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5354 MPE ---, .i MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE NAVAL RECORDS DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj: REVIEW...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01888-01
On 14 November 1994 you and were ordered to The record reflects that on 26 June 1995 you were advised that you did not meet the Navy's weight and body fat standards and would be enrolled in the command's remedial physical conditioning program until the next official physical readiness test (PRT). On 3 December 1997 the commanding officer directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. In addition to In that On 21 December 2000 the Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01893-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01894-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. prior to submitting this request you conferred with a qualified military lawyer at which time you were advised of your rights and warned of the probabl adverse...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01895-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01900-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory I2 October 2001, a copy of 130D2/0 1 II 1296 of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01902-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 1902-01 5 December 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10 of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01904-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01
1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01914-01
recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01915-00
1915-00 14 August 2000 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. Ms. Hardbower reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01915-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her leave balance as of 1 October 2000 be credited with an additional 4.5 days of accrued leave to compensate him for leave errenously lost in 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01916-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 1916-00 18 October 2000 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: PN REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN 60 (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01920-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant existence of probable material error or injustice. - Form 149, Block (1) In the enclosure accompanying reference (a), (DD 9), the Subject makes the following contention: "I was separated from the U.S. Navy (Reserve) due to misconduct with a was found not guilty on all counts and was not allowed to plead my case before a court martial prior to separation." I (2) At the start of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01922-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correc record to reflect that he did not terminate enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01923-00
Y DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 TJR Docket No: 1923-00 28 August 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. f. It appears that Petitioner did not receive the DD Form 215 because in his application for correction of his record, he requests that the Board upgrade his general discharge to fully honorable. Based on the foregoing, and considering the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01930-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show show that he elected conjunction with his reenlistment of 9 June 2000.. ” not ” to sell 25.5 days of Lump Sum Leave (LSL) in Caron, and Ms. Madison, reviewed 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01936-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5326. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Board, having...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01939-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Nurse Corps Community Manager dated 9 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. All sources of information applicable at the time th accepted commissioning were congruent in the use of the including BUPERSINST 1131.3, SECNAVINST 'appointment', 10 which continue to use the term 'appointment' to mean permanent appointment. The enlisted service obligation terminates at the 11(c) of BUPERSINST paragraph Il.(g).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01942-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1942-01 14 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01943-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 12 June 2001, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01944-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. To support his appeal, the petitioner furnishes his own statement. The Board does not, however, find this to invalidate the entire report and has directed removal of the following verbiage from Section I: ™“..where he was charged with Driving While Intoxicated, later...” As modified,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01945-01
He also stated that a member could bank time from other commands because flight time was flight time, no matter where a member flew. e to my office to look over Master Chief inal documentation ere was no way possible tha a as Fr To Subj: LIGHT RECORDS After reviewing subject members NATOPS Jacket and Service 1. In this case, the reporting senior made it clear in block-42 Comments on Performance, the reason for preparing the report as he did.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01948-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01949-01
On 16 October 1995 you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. You did not provide the second page You were not An RE-3B means the individual was discharged for Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of pregnancy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01951-00
selection to Staff Sergeant be revoked. cting recommendation should have been referred to Sergeant comment before it was sent to Headquarters, U.S. Marine Per reference (a), c THE CASE OF SERGEANT Corps. that, isconduct, The delay, in itself, Sergean had the selection board been he likely would have failed did not result in his failure Sergea relief be In a letter supporting etition, the CG, I MEF, For the reasons cited above, we believe omotion would have been revoked 5. recommends that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01953-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1953-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by of which is attached. Correction of Naval This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Records onlv.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01956-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1956-01 12 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01960-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 1960-01 6 August 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Continuous Submarine Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01962-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01963-01
You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeitures of $240 per month for two months, reduction in rank to PVT (E-l), and a bad conduct discharge. the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two NJPs and a special court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01967-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. totalling $396,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01974-00
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has granted your requests to file a clear copy of the fitness report for 18 May 1981 to 4 February 1982, remove the reviewing officer comments from that report, and remove part of a sentence from the report for 30 March to 9 May 1983. fitness reports was requested: Removal of the a. b. Board is directing the complete removal of the Reviewing Officer comments furnished by Colonel Julian since reference contained no provision to allow...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01979-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1979-01 17 September 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade A03/E4. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01980-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01981-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 12 September 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board denied your request to change the discharge to honorable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01982-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were processed for an In connection with this At that time you were not recommended for On 12 September pro&ssing, You state in your application that you do not deserve the RE-4 reenlistment code because you were only...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01984-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01986-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01987-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an honorable discharge on 13 March 1997. time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to In this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01991-01
materi 1 considered by the Board consisted of your record and applicable statutes, regulations er with all material submitted in support After careful and record, the Board insufficient to es ablish the existence of probable material error or injustice onscientious consideration of the entire ound that the evidence submitted was i You enlisted in th recor age 17. until 5 October been arrested by The On 12 December 194 Naval Personnel o recommended that noted that indivi authority for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02009-01
That same day you were counseled and warned that further Seventeen days However, on 8 June 1987 you received nonjudicial (NJP) for failure to go to your appointed place of The punishment imposed was a suspended reduction in rate On 20 May 1988 you received The punishment imposed was a reduction in rate to _ Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for an administrative discharge due to a pattern of misconduct. At that In your application, you request a correction to the record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02011-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HN Sartor's annex to his DD Form 4 indicates he was guaranteed "Hospital Corpsman (Five Year Obligation) Program," but not NCF Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02013-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 1970 you were so...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02013-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02014-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. average marks of 4.0...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02015-01
In connection with this processing, you were processed for Subsequently, the You state in your application that you wanted to leave recruit training so that you could solve some personal problems. is separated prior to completing recruit training after being diagnosed with a personality disorder that interfered with the ability to perform military duties. no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02021-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...