AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05715
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. Specifically, AFI 36-2905, attachment 13 states: any medication that affects the heart rate or the heart's response to exercise may invalidate aerobic component of the FA. As the applicant has indicated, an exemption should have been considered on this basis; however, he has not provided any documentation that validates his prescription for the medication, nor identified FA exemptions due to his using the medication. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05716
Beyond the cardio exemption, there is no evidence that the applicant should have been exempt from any other component. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response the applicant states that after receiving the Air Force advisory opinion it was clear that he did not provide the supporting medical documents, therefore he submits a copy of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs. AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., unit commanders: advise members who schedule use or lose leave in August...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05746
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, be corrected to remove Item 26, Separation Code, JFX, Item 27, Reentry Code, 2C and Item 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, Personality...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779
A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05812
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on their review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine that the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) should have been awarded during the applicant's service from 7 June 1965 to 31 October 1985 and was not reflected in his records. The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05912
In addition, the Department of Defense Inspector General (IG DoD/MRI) concurred with the determination, approved the report, and substantiated the allegations (Exhibit B). We note that based on the Report of Investigation (ROI) from the SAF/IG the applicant was the victim of reprisal under the Whistleblower Protection Act (10 USC 1034) by his former commander who denied his reenlistment and attendance at the Chief Executive Course (CEC). Other than the comments in the ROI, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05944
Furthermore, although the applicant states feedback was not accomplished, the applicant signed the initial EPR acknowledging feedback was completed during the reporting period. The initial EPR is not the document which is a matter of record and should not be considered in this situation. As for her rebuttal argument that the EPR was not signed by the appropriate additional rater, again, other than her own assertions, she has provided no evidence in support of this argument either.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013- 00979
AFBCMR BC-2013-00979 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that she was awarded an additional 13 non-paid inactive duty training points for Retention/Retirement Year Ending 13...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00002
On 5 Nov 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 86.30, which constituted a satisfactory assessment where she was credited with 30 pushups.. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. However, a FAC staff member subsequently informed her that her form was incorrect. Regardless of whether the push-ups were counted or not, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. On 8 Jun 87, the discharge authority requested permission to execute the applicants discharge from the Air Force with the characterization of service of UOTHC while...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00007
On 17 Apr 12, the discharge authority approved the separation, and the applicant was discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of fraudulent entry into military service. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 31 Mar 13, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. The RE code which was issued at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00021
In accordance with ANGI 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard as a Reserve of the Air Force, the term of enlistment for all non- prior service (NPS) applicants will be for a period of six years. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00022
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00026
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00026 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00035
The Board should consider his request and award him the PH because he heard of a few guys who received the PH and did not have an injury. The applicant's request cannot be considered by the PH Review Board unless there is a detailed personal account of how the injury occurred, medical documentation substantiating treatment was received, and eyewitness statements. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00039
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00039 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 27 Dec 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to an administrative error, the correct duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00041
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Oct 2013, the applicant provided a copy of DA Form 330, Language Proficiency Questionnaire. To quality for the UR tests for the Korean language, the applicant first needed to complete the LR tests for the same language with a passing score; which he completed on 9 Jun 2011. At the time the test was administered, a score of 2...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00048
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2013-00048 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00053
_______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request for removal of the contested FAs. The applicant has failed to provide any information from the rating officials on the contested report. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00053 in Executive Session on 30 Jan 2014, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00058
Note, the applicant provided the cardiology documentation; however, it is beyond this offices expertise to interpret the results. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 19 September 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00060
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00060 COUNSEL: NONE . DPSID states they were unable to verify the applicant deployed in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD and that he does not meet the qualifications for award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2013-00060 in Executive Session on 5...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00064
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant did provide documentation stating he went to his medical provider on 7 Dec 12; however, there is no evidence that a medical condition precluded him from passing the FA. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00065
AFBCMR BC-2013-00065 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 8 October 2012, he executed a DD Form 2839, Career Status Bonus (CSB) election, electing to receive a single lump...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00066
His military records reflect he was assigned to the 20th Special Operations Squadron in Vietnam from 15 October 1968 to 26 April 1969. The complete DPSID advisory is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFOUA with Valor was awarded to the 20th SOS during different time periods. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00067
He initiated shipment of household goods prior to this temporary duty (TDY) assignment in order to alleviate stress on his wife and because of the short time frame between his return from TDY and permanent change of station (PCS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends partial relief. The complete PPA HQ/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00069
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating there is no record or documentation showing the applicant transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00072
Regarding the applicants request that she be given a 20 year active duty retirement with full retirement benefits, A1K states that her medical case which included the applicable documentation that ultimately led to a finding of ILOD was appropriately reviewed and a determination was made on that case by the PEB. The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant certainly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00081
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 21 March 1960, the applicant was issued an Air Form 741, Small Arms Qualification Record, which indicates he qualified as a sharpshooter, but did not qualify as a marksman or an expert. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00084
He served 10 months and 16 days on active duty On 11 June 1985, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable and his narrative reason for discharge (Unsuitability Character and Behavior Disorders) be changed. He provided no facts warranting a change to his reason and authority. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge to include the applicants reason...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00087
The office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant agrees with the recommendation in the advisory opinion; however, she believes that the errors in her record caused by the break in service may have led to her nonselection for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00092
He was rated on personal bias and events that occurred outside the reporting period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C through E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to void and remove the contested EPR. Therefore, we find no basis to recommend...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00104
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00104 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents effective 11 February 2010. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He elected to transfer his educational...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00105
On 16 Jun 10, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file and medical records and also recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent for diagnosis of POTS using VASRD code 8299-8210. Her condition has not changed in severity, the DVA made their rating by correctly applying the laws for analogous ratings. In this respect, the applicant is requesting that her medical discharge be changed to a medical retirement based on the 80 percent...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00107
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00107 COUNSEL: THOMAS R. MASON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to a Medical discharge. We note that the DVA rated his disabilities at 80 percent; however, the applicant has provided no evidence showing that he had an unfitting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00108
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00108 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his service in Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00110
The overseas long tour ribbon was omitted based on incorrect Foreign Service time on her DD Form 214. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIPV states that the applicants DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect Date Entered Active Duty (Item 12a) and will be corrected to read 12 Aug 77. However, both the DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to the DD Form 214, reflects the applicants full service time.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00113
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00113 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 Oct 70, the applicant presented his immediate supervisor with a letter to resign his status as a NCO and requested immediate discharge. On 4 Nov 70,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00120
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00120 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her involuntary discharge (under honorable conditions) for personality disorder be changed to a medical separation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The Medical Consultant states that while the evidence is not supportive of a medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00123
On 30 October 2003, the applicant was promoted to the permanent grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 1 November 2003. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided any supporting documentation to substantiate that he should have been promoted after the revocation of his promotion to master sergeant. In this case, the applicant provided a promotion order, as well as a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00129
AFBCMR BC-2013-00129 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00132
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded and his civilian records cleared. He was given military counsel and pled guilty to two uses of cocaine. The applicants response, with attachments is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00135
The Helicopter Rescue Award provided by the applicant reflects that he received this award for his skill and courage while participating as a crew member on 14 May 1960 in a lifesaving mission with a Sikorsky helicopter. However, we find the evidence provided, which includes an AM certificate signed by the 7th AF/CC for meritorious achievement and the Helicopter Rescue Award for a lifesaving mission during the same time frame sufficient to conclude the applicant was awarded the AM. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00139
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00139 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants General (Under Honorable Conditions)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00142
The applicants service records are at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that the applicants service records should be corrected to show he was promoted to any grade higher than that reflected in his military records. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00146
DPSIT states that there is no documentation or evidence to support that the applicant initiated action to obtain the 4 year retainability required for the TEB active duty service commitment (ADSC). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00146 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00149
She was provided due process and her appeal of the punishment was reviewed by the Air Force Material Command Commander and the Article 15 was determined to be legally sufficient. She has not provided any evidence showing that the imposing commander abused his discretionary authority, that her substantial rights were violated during the processing of the Article 15 punishment, or that the punishment exceeded the maximum authorized by the UCMJ. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00150
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00150 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00151
Moreover, we are not persuaded by the evidence that the stratification statements contained in the PRF reviewed by the CY06 Lt Col Promotion board were not consistent with his complete record of performance. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00152
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed in order for him to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...