Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00107
Original file (BC-2013-00107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00107
		COUNSEL:  THOMAS R. MASON
	XXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED:  YES

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to 
a Medical discharge. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is medically unemployable.

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) letters and various other 
documents associated with his request. 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 15 Nov 2010, the applicant was discharged from the Air 
National Guard (ANG) in the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5) 
with service characterized as general (under honorable 
conditions).

________________________________________________________________

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/SGPF recommends denial. SGPF states that the only medical 
documentation included for review was a DVA  Award Amount and 
Payment notification dated 24 Jul 2012, and a Rating Decision 
dated 22 Jun 2012.  There is no evidence of any line of duty 
determination to indicate the applicant incurred or aggravated 
any medical conditions while serving in the ANG.  Furthermore, 
the applicant has failed to provide any ANG medical records to 
warrant a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), and subsequent medical 
retirement.

The complete SGPF evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________




APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 Mar 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the member for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice 
that occurred in the discharge processing.  Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was 
consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge 
regulation.  We note that the DVA rated his disabilities at 80 
percent; however, the applicant has provided no evidence showing 
that he had an unfitting medical condition at the time of his 
discharge that would have required his processing through the 
Military Disability Evaluation System – a prerequisite to a 
medical discharge.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence that 
convincingly refutes the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility, we agree with their 
recommendation and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that he has not been the victim of an error of 
injustice and find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2013-00107 in Executive Session on 5 Sep 2013, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

    , Panel Chair	
    , Member	
    , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-00107:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Military Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/SGPF, dated 7 Mar 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Mar 2013.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

2


2






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03304

    Original file (BC-2011-03304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should have been discharged via a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and should have received disability compensation given the severity of her medical conditions. The complete SGPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. NGB/A1PS concurs with the SGPF’s advisory and therefore recommends no action be taken unless the applicant can provide documentation showing her medical conditions were deemed service connected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00429

    Original file (BC-2013-00429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00429 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge from the Air National Guard be changed to a medical retirement. Although the applicant claims he presented medical documentation and treatment records to his unit, we note that other than his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01215

    Original file (BC 2013 01215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Dec 02, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendation for discharge and the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service and a reason for discharge of “conduct prejudicial to good order” in Feb 03. A complete copy of the NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He submits a personal statement describing some of the harassment...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00741

    Original file (BC 2013 00741.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No further treatment records were included or available for review while this applicant was a member with the MT ANG. Thus, a medical condition that was not unfitting while in service, and was not the cause of separation or retirement, which may later progress in severity causing disability, or which was merely determined service connected by the DVA, is not a basis to retroactively grant a military medical retirement. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, 12 Dec 13.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01911

    Original file (BC-2012-01911.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time she was discharged she had no idea that she was permanently disqualified from reentering a military service. The medical discharge is a false representation of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00805

    Original file (BC-2013-00805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the MEDCON orders were not completed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPF recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04516

    Original file (BC-2012-04516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6P (medically disqualified/pending waiver) be changed to allow him to reenter the service. Conditions which may seriously compromise the near-term well-being if an individual were to deploy are disqualifying for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05195

    Original file (BC-2012-05195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to his service related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and depression in the wake of the natural disaster “Katrina” he separated from the Air Force after 17 plus years of honorable service with the Regular Air Force, AF Reserve, and Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01608

    Original file (BC 2013 01608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01608 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed to a medical retirement with the associated back pay. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of medical documents, orders, a letter written by the XXXX Space Operations Squadron commander dated 26 March 2013, stating the applicant should have been allowed to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00920

    Original file (BC 2013 00920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00920 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receives Incapacitation (INCAP) Pay, for the period 9 February 2012 through 28 October 2012. In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her letter of request for INCAP pay dated 31 Aug 12, with application for INCAP pay with final...