RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00069 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent son. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He submitted a transfer of benefits request prior to his retirement with the assistance of the Wing Retention Office Manager (ROM). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard on 6 Jan 86. On 30 Dec 11, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve List and was credited with 31 years and 25 days of total military service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating there is no record or documentation showing the applicant transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement. The Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09 by virtue of the passage of Public Law (PL) No. 110-252, which was signed by the President on 30 Jun 08.PL No. 110-252, section 3319(f)(1) states in part, that “an individual approved to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.” Directive Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003 – Post-9/11 GI Bill, dated 22 Jun 09, attachment 2, paragraph 3.g.1 states, an individual approved to transfer entitlement, may transfer to family member only while serving in the armed forces. Both of these documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to the effective date of the Post 9/11 GI Bill. DoD developed a special website to facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. On 27 Jun 09, the website was operational for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications. Both the DTM and AFI 36-2306 state the transfer must be made while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The DMDC website has the feature to track a member’s transfer record from the initial request to any changes or modifications made to the request. A search was conducted and no record of the applicant was found. The former ROM for the applicant’s unit stated she remembered meeting with the applicant but not the specifics of what was discussed. She indicated that normally when she helps members process their TEB request, she has them print a screen shot showing their request is “pending review”. After a review of her records, there was no documentation showing she assisted the applicant in processing his request. A complete copy of the NGB/A1Y evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Other than his own uncorroborated assertions, the applicant has provided no documentary evidence whatsoever that indicates he submitted a transfer of benefits request prior to his retirement. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00069 in Executive Session on 12 Nov 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jan 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 27 Feb 13, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Mar 13. Panel Chair 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC