RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00064
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 7 Dec 12 be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He experienced chronic chest pain while taking the FA test due
to a history of Upper Respiratory Infections (URI). The FA
results were updated in the AFFMS the same day; however, he was
given five days to be seen by the base medical staff, which
would allow his commander to void the test.
In support of his request, the applicant provides an excerpt
from his medical records.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of airman first class.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE RESULT
16 Dec 11 EXCELLENT
* 7 Dec 12 UNSATISFACTORY
25 Jan 13 EXCELLENT
* Contested FA test.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. The applicant did provide
documentation stating he went to his medical provider on 7 Dec
12; however, there is no evidence that a medical condition
precluded him from passing the FA. Furthermore, there is no
documentation from his commander invalidating the 7 Dec 12 FA
test.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 24 Feb 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00064 in Executive Session on 12 Dec 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Dec 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Sep 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Sep 13.
Panel Chair
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4
3
This document contains information which must be protected IAW AFI 33-332 and DoD Regulation
5400.11; Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended Applies, and it is For Official Use Only (FOUO).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00963
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Apr 13 90.40 Excellent 16 Jan 13 78.40 Unsatisfactory 14 Jun 12 100.00 Excellent *7 May 12 88.70 Unsatisfactory 8 Feb 12 79.90 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01195
On 22 Feb 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received a composite score of 68.00 resulting in an unsatisfactory fitness score. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 23 Sep 2013 88.50 Satisfactory 28 Mar 2013 94.67 Excellent *22 Feb 2013 68.00 Unsatisfactory 23 Aug 2013 88.10 Satisfactory 02 Feb 2013 100.00 Excellent * Contested FA On 15 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00561
On 15 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request to remove his FA dated 13 Dec 12. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625
According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered Unsatisfactory. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00401
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00401 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 8 January 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the OPR's recommendation to deny the request, we find the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468
A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078
A list of the applicants last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...