Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00135
Original file (BC-2013-00135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
			RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
	AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:					DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00135
							COUNSEL:  NONE
   							HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Medal (AM).  

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 7 August 1969, he was awarded the AM for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight from 2 April 1969 to 24 May 1969.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the AM and the Helicopter Rescue Award.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served on active duty from 18 June 1965 to 23 June 1969 and was released under honorable conditions.  

He was assigned as a Pararescueman with the 37th Aerospace Rescue Recovery Squadron, Da Nang, Vietnam, from 8 February 1969 to 21 May 1969.

The AM is awarded to U.S. military and civilian personnel for single acts of heroism or meritorious achievements while participating in aerial flight and foreign military personnel in actual combat in support of operations.  The required achievement is less than that required for the Distinguished Flying Cross, but must be accomplished with distinction above and beyond that expected of professional airmen.

The AM certificate provided by the applicant reflects that the AM was awarded for Meritorious Achievement while participating in Aerial Flight from 2 April 1969 to 24 May 1969.

The Helicopter Rescue Award provided by the applicant reflects that he received this award for his skill and courage while participating as a crew member on 14 May 1960 in a lifesaving mission with a Sikorsky helicopter.  

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  DPSID states that although the applicant provided a signed certificate for the AM, a citation and special order was not provided.  DPSID was also unable to locate documents in the applicant’s service records to substantiate award of the AM.  The applicant contends he received the AM for trying to save a life in Vietnam; however, this is inconsistent with the AM certificate as lifesaving events tend to be a one day event.  The provided citation has an inclusive period of nearly two months and shows to have been for meritorious achievement.  Service members are normally recognized with the AM or the Air Force Commendation Medal with Valor for acts of courage or heroism involving voluntary risk of life whereas the AM recognizes service members for achievements while participating in aerial flight.  Due to the inconsistencies with the applicant's claim and the provided certificate, the authenticity of the certificate is questionable. Nonetheless, should the Board determine the applicant has exhausted all avenues of administrative relief, we recommend denial based on lack of official documentation in his official military personnel records verifying the applicant was recommended for and awarded the AM. To grant award of the AM would be contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1384.33, Manual of Military Decorations and Awards: DoD Service Awards-Campaign, Expeditionary and Service Awards.

Upon the Board’s final decision, DPSID will administratively correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation, Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars, Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm.  
   
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The AM he received was for on-going missions in May 1969 into North Vietnam in search of a downed pilot.  He also received the Helicopter Rescue Award for rescuing someone with a bleeding ulcer. 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a thorough review of the evidence presented, we are persuaded relief is warranted.  We note the recommendation from the Air Force Office or Primary Responsibility (OPR) to deny the relief based on the fact they were unable to locate any official source documents in the applicant’s military personnel records, i.e., the special orders, awarding him the AM.  We also note that the OPR questions the authenticity of the AM.  However, we find the evidence provided, which includes an AM certificate signed by the 7th AF/CC for meritorious achievement and the Helicopter Rescue Award for a lifesaving mission during the same time frame sufficient to conclude  the applicant was awarded the AM.  Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected to reflect award of the AM.  We also note that the Air Force OPR has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the PUC, VSM w/2 BSS, SAEMR, RVNGC w/P, and his DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect these medals.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.  

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to reflect that his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his separation on 23 Jun 1969, be amended in Item 24, Decorations, Medals, Badges, or Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, to include the Air Medal.  

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2013-00135 in Executive Session on 26 Sep 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	  , Panel Chair
	  , Member
	  , Member





All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following pertinent evidence in Docket Number BC-2013-00135 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jan 2013, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Military Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 13 May 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 2013.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.

    


 
					Panel Chair


 

 


 


 

 


 

 


 


 


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04672

    Original file (BC-2012-04672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends that the applicant’s DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect Foreign Service time. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04667

    Original file (BC-2012-04667.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04667 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he is entitled to 4-5 additional Air Medals (AM). AFPC/DPSID states after a complete review of the applicant’s military personnel record (MPR), they have verified the applicant’s entitlement to the VSM and his record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01200

    Original file (BC-2013-01200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the BSM and AM indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01828

    Original file (BC 2013 01828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01828 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Medal (AM). He has a limited official military personnel record, consisting of two Reports of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 214), dated 20 Jun 52 and 20 Jun 55. We took notice of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05097

    Original file (BC 2012 05097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he would have been selected for promotion to master sergeant if credited with the Air Medal. As for the applicant’s request that he be promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), in view of the fact that we have determined there is no basis to recommend granting the AM, we find...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04259

    Original file (BC 2013 04259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID is unable to determine the dates and locations for the applicant's TDY to Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for award of the AFEM, VSM, or the VCM during the award inclusive periods. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2013- 04259 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00910

    Original file (BC 2013 00910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Enlisted Record of Service reflects that he was awarded the DFC and the AM, with Three Oak Leaf Clusters (AM, w/3OLCs). ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, stating in part, that the applicant was previously given guidance in 1998 to assist in the process of requesting the DFC, w/1OLC and additional AMs. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05473

    Original file (BC 2012 05473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s military service records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate any foreign service time in Vietnam or Laos. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH, AM, VSM with six Service Stars. Applicant's Military Service Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02307

    Original file (BC 2013 02307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AM, PUC, Air Force Overseas Ribbon and the AFEM. There is no documentation to support the applicant’s unit of assignment, with inclusive dates, was awarded the PUC. Since the applicant served before this time period, he is not eligible for award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03177

    Original file (BC 2014 03177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant refers to orders, we are unable to locate any of the award elements that should have been attached to the memorandum, and none were provided. DPSID also notes that based on a review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were able to determine the applicant should be awarded the VSM w/3BSS and the RVNGC w/P, during his service from 6 Sep 66 to 4 Sep 70 which were not reflected in his records. Upon final board decision, administrative correction...