Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00069
Original file (BC-2013-00069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00069
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependent son.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He submitted a transfer of benefits request prior to his 
retirement with the assistance of the Wing Retention Office 
Manager (ROM).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s NGB Form 22, Report of Separation 
and Record of Service, the applicant enlisted in the Air 
National Guard on 6 Jan 86.

On 30 Dec 11, the applicant was transferred to the Retired 
Reserve List and was credited with 31 years and 25 days of total 
military service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating there is no record or 
documentation showing the applicant transferred his Post 9/11 GI 
Bill benefits prior to his retirement.  

The Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09 by 
virtue of the passage of Public Law (PL) No. 110-252, which was 
signed by the President on 30 Jun 08.PL No. 110-252, section 
3319(f)(1) states in part, that “an individual approved to 
transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this 
section may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a 
member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.”  
Directive Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003 – Post-9/11 GI Bill, 
dated 22 Jun 09, attachment 2, paragraph 3.g.1 states, an 
individual approved to transfer entitlement, may transfer to 
family member only while serving in the armed forces.  Both of 
these documents were published on government-hosted websites 
prior to the effective date of the Post 9/11 GI Bill.   

DoD developed a special website to facilitate the transfer of 
educational benefits.  On 27 Jun 09, the website was operational 
for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications.  
Both the DTM and AFI 36-2306 state the transfer must be made 
while the member is serving in the Armed Forces.  Both documents 
were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, 
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

The DMDC website has the feature to track a member’s transfer 
record from the initial request to any changes or modifications 
made to the request.  A search was conducted and no record of 
the applicant was found.

The former ROM for the applicant’s unit stated she remembered 
meeting with the applicant but not the specifics of what was 
discussed.  She indicated that normally when she helps members 
process their TEB request, she has them print a screen shot 
showing their request is “pending review”.  After a review of 
her records, there was no documentation showing she assisted the 
applicant in processing his request.

A complete copy of the NGB/A1Y evaluation, with attachments, is 
at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 8 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Other than his own uncorroborated assertions, the applicant has 
provided no documentary evidence whatsoever that indicates he 
submitted a transfer of benefits request prior to his 
retirement.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00069 in Executive Session on 12 Nov 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                   , Panel Chair
                   , Member
                   , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Jan 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1Y, dated 27 Feb 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Mar 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair





3 




DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
	WASHINGTON DC

 


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00069

    Original file (BC 2013 00069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating there is no record or documentation showing the applicant transferred his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04634

    Original file (BC-2012-04634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not provided guidance or advice regarding the need to adjust or transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill entitlement prior to his retirement. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01355

    Original file (BC-2012-01355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-003- Post-9/11 GI Bill, 22 Jun 2009, (reissued 14 Sep 2011) attachment 2, paragraph 3g (2) (a) 2 states: "An individual may not add dependents after retirement or separation from the Armed Forces, but may modify the number of months of the transferred benefit after retirement or separation for those dependents who had received transferred benefits prior to separation or retirement." To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00585

    Original file (BC 2014 00585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00585 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03206

    Original file (BC-2012-03206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would have transferred his benefits had he been informed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05450

    Original file (BC 2013 05450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05450 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends granting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00672

    Original file (BC 2014 00672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00672 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to his retirement out-processing, he attempted to transfer education benefits to his dependent, but was unable to due to technical difficulties with the website. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02017

    Original file (BC 2013 02017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he was entitled to benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill program in his own right. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1Y recommends approval, indicating there is no evidence the applicant received guidance on the Post 9/11 GI Bill or instructions to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02569

    Original file (BC 2014 02569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to his retirement in Sept 09 he submitted a request online through his personnel office to transfer his Post 9/11-GI Bill Education Benefits to his children. The applicant states, that the OPR is correct in that he was briefed on the Post 9/11-GI Bill and the process to transfer his educational benefits. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 Sep 09, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03975

    Original file (BC 2013 03975 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Prior to retiring from the Air Force, he was incorrectly informed that his dependents listed in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) would appear as potential Post-9/11 GI Bill beneficiaries. During the briefings, members were strongly advised to transfer at least month of benefits to all eligible dependents prior to their retirement, as dependents are ineligible to receive...