Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03930
Original file (BC-2012-03930.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03930 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His fitness assessments (FAs), dated 27 October 2010, 26 January 
2011, 26 April 2011, 15 July 2011 and 13 April 2012, be removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

On 12 April 2012, he was diagnosed with hypogonadism. While 
there is no way to determine how long he has been affected by 
this, his primary care manager believes it has been undiagnosed 
for at least two years. This condition had a direct impact on 
his ability to maintain fitness standards. 

 

Approximately three years ago, he reported suffering from 
fatigue as well as persistent headaches for about six months. 
He was diagnosed with sleep apnea and told to lose weight. 

 

While deployed, he was selected to retrain. He attended 
technical school in August and reassigned to Travis Air Force 
Base, California. He took a FA on 27 October 2010; it was one 
of the worst scores ever recorded. He was placed on a mandatory 
physical training (PT) program for five days a week for the 
following two years. He improved drastically; yet, he could not 
achieve a minimum passing score on his FA. He was still 
extremely fatigued, sore and the headaches also persisted. He 
contributed these symptoms to sleep apnea and the PT sessions. 

 

After his fourth FA failure in July 2011, he was prepared to 
separate from the Air Force. He was selected for another 
deployment. He began running twice a day and he completed push-
ups and sit-ups hourly. After the third month, he began to feel 
uncharacteristically irritable and extremely fatigued. Once he 
returned from his deployment, the ordeal was all but forgotten. 
After being home for a month, he began to feel fatigued again 
and the headaches returned. However, this time he also began to 
feel dizzy and lightheaded. 

 

On 10 April 2012, he sought treatment for what he believed was 
depression and was diagnosed with Hypogonadism. This meant his 
body was either unwilling or unable to produce a sufficient 


amount of testosterone to function properly. It also caused 
fatigue and a decrease in muscle mass. He was prescribed a 
testotosterone supplement and his well being dramatically 
improved. 

 

He believes this condition has been the reason he has been 
unable to meet and maintain Air Force standards. There is no 
way to determine how long he has been affected by this 
condition. He is currently being reevaluated for sleep apnea. 
Once all of this is sorted out and the testosterone is 
supplemented, he believes he will be able to exceed the fitness 
standards. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this case are 
contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility which is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of removing the cardio, sit-up 
and push-up portions of the FAs dated 13 April 2012, 15 July 
2011 and 26 April 2011. 

 

The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition 
Report, with an expiration date of 20 July 2012 and an AF Form 
422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualifications Status, 
exempting him form all components of the FA, except the 
abdominal circumference. 

 

He also provided a memorandum from his primary care manager 
stating his FA failures dated, 13 April 2012, 15 July 2011 and 
26 April 2011, should be invalidated due to the likelihood the 
applicant had a slow progressing affect from his low 
testosterone. The 26 January 2011 FA is questionable. 

 

AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, para 4.2.5 states that all members 
will complete the abdominal circumference assessment unless 
there is a composite exemption or, under rare circumstances, a 
component exemption determined by the Exercise 


Physiologist/Fitness Program Manager (EP/FPM) upon the 
recommendation of a provider. 

 

The cardio, sit-up and push-up components of the each FA dated, 
13 April 2012, 15 July 2011 and 26 April 2011, should be updated 
to reflect exempt in AFFMS. The members overall fitness 
assessments will change to reflect the following: 13 April 2012 
(72.00_- Unsatisfactory), 15 July 2011 (53.00 – Unsatisfactory) 
and 26 April 2011 (47.00 – unsatisfactory). There is no 
documentation to support removal of the 27 October 2010 FA. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 26 November 2012, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received 
no response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with regard 
to the applicant’s request to remove the contested FAs from the 
AFFMS. With respect to the 27 October 2010 FA, we note the 
applicant has provided no evidence to indicate that at the time 
of this contested FA, he had a duty limiting medical condition 
that precluded him from obtaining a successful score. 
Concerning the remaining FAs, we find insufficient evidence to 
warrant their removal in their entirety. In view of the above 
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis 
upon which to recommend favorable consideration of his request 
to remove the contested FAs from the AFFMS. 

 

4. Notwithstanding the above determination, we believe some 
relief is warranted. We took note of the recommendation of the 
office of primary responsibility to “exempt” the applicant from 
the sit-up, push-up and cardio components of the 13 April 2012, 
15 July 2011 and 26 April 2011 FAs in AFFMS and agree the record 
should be corrected accordingly. We also find that the FA dated 
26 January 2011 should be corrected based on the physician’s 


opinion that the applicant’s medical condition may have affected 
this assessment, as well. However, our review of the 
applicant’s fitness assessment history reflects that the 
13 April 2012 assessment already reflects the “exempt” status 
therefore; Board action on this FA assessment is not required. 
Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected 
only to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the sit-
up, push-up and cardio components of the Fitness Assessments 
dated 15 July 2011, 26 April 2011 and 26 January 2011, be 
updated to reflect “exempt” and all other components remain in 
the Air Force Fitness Management System. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03930 in Executive Session on 4 April 2013 under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Nov 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04796

    Original file (BC-2012-04796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04796 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 April 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicant be exempt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03476

    Original file (BC-2012-03476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-03476 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 30 March 2012 and 28 June 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Board notes the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, indicating there is a direct relationship between...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871

    Original file (BC 2012 04871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779

    Original file (BC-2012-05779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04774

    Original file (BC-2012-04774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04774 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 10 July 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to “exempt” the applicant from the sit-up, push-up...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01586

    Original file (BC 2013 01586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01586 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Dec 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 19 Sep...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598

    Original file (BC-2012-03598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...