Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846
Original file (BC-2012-03846.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03846 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 27 Jun 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the 
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His score for the run portion of the FA was incorrectly 
recorded. His score was 12:19 and not 13:34 as recorded. 

 

During the FA in question he ran alongside fellow a airman for 
four laps and passed him on the fifth lap. Upon crossing the 
finish line he heard the timekeeper state 12 minutes but could 
not make out the seconds. The airman indicates the applicant 
completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. 
Also, the applicant activated the run tracker application on his 
cell phone within ten seconds of starting the run and the stats 
reflect he had a run time of 12:11 on 27 Jun 12. 

 

He cooled down for a moment after completing his run but noticed 
another airman struggling to complete their last lap. He again 
entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing 
the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the 
finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel 
incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. He informed the FAC 
personnel that his run time was not accurate and requested to 
see the log sheet. His run time of 12:19 was lined through and 
replaced with 13:34. He was told the 12:19 was recorded in the 
wrong place and was corrected with the 13:34. Also, a FAC staff 
member informed him that they remembered him reentering the 
track and did not record the time of the second airman as his 
time. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the rank of technical sergeant (E-6). 

 

On 27 Jun 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA 
attaining a cardio time of 13:34, abdominal circumference 
measurement of 36 inches, and was exempt from push-up and sit-
ups. His overall score was 74.13. The minimum passing score for 
an FA is 75.00. 

 

Under the provisions of AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, the 
service member signs the score sheet upon completion of the FA 
acknowledging the results of the FA. 

 

On 12 Sep 12, AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide 
additional documentation to substantiate his claim; 
specifically, a signed memorandum by fitness test administrators 
attesting to what occurred during the run portion of the FA in 
question. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice. Although the applicant provided a 
witness statement indicating he completed his run before 12:59, 
DPSIM cannot validate this against the FAC's log as the log does 
not indicate which runner was the witness, nor does it reflect 
anyone finishing the run with a time of 12:59. The closest 
participant finished the run at 13:04; while it is possible the 
witness's run was officially recorded as 13:04, there is no way 
to confirm this. Nor is there any way to confirm the validity of 
the timing information on the GPS printout. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 19 Apr 13, for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 


2. The application was timely filed. 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant contends the cardio component score for his 27 Jun 12 
fitness assessment (FA) was incorrectly recorded. After a 
thorough review of the applicant’s complete submission, we 
believe that a preponderance of the evidence indicates that 
corrective action is warranted. In this respect, we note the 
applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow 
participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must 
be erroneous as the applicant completed the run in close 
proximity to the witness who attained a passing score. While we 
note the comments of AFPC/DPSIM indicating that it is not 
possible to know for sure if the applicant’s score was 
incorrectly recorded, we find the supporting statement and copy 
of the excerpt from the fitness assessment cell (FAC) entry log 
sufficient to support the applicant’s version of the events in 
question and find it reasonable to conclude the applicant’s time 
was erroneously re-recorded when he ventured back onto the track 
after completing his FA to help another Airman do the same. 
Therefore, to preclude the possibility of an injustice to the 
applicant, we recommend that his records be corrected as 
indicated below 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that his 
Fitness Assessment, dated 27 Jun 12, be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03846 in Executive Session on 13 Jun 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 9 Apr 13, /atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Apr 13. 

 

 

 

 


 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891

    Original file (BC-2012-04891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387

    Original file (BC-2012-02387.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02511

    Original file (BC-2012-02511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the FAC’s lap count sheets from his 16 Feb 12 FA and his retest on 13 Mar 12. The applicant’s last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Mar 12 85.70 Satisfactory 16 Feb 12 72.20 Unsatisfactory 12 Jul 11 83.10 Satisfactory 23 May 11 75.80 Unsatisfactory 16 Nov 10 77.80 Satisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03926

    Original file (BC-2012-03926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 10 Sep 09, 10 Dec 09, 31 Aug 10, 13 Oct 10, and 16 Feb 11, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS); in the alternative, his records be corrected to reflect he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01974

    Original file (BC 2013 01974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01974 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 February 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 14 February 2013, the applicant completed the contested FA and received an unsatisfactory overall score of 35.90 due to completing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03366

    Original file (BC-2012-03366.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05052

    Original file (BC 2013 05052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his contentions, he submits a Primary Care Manager Memorandum dated 8 Jul 13, recommending the contested FA be invalidated and noting the applicant was cleared to retake the FA within 10 duty days, due to a pending profile; a Duty Limiting Condition Report (AF Form 469), dated 8 Jul 13, and a Fitness Assessment Score Sheet, dated 15 Jul 13. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 31 Jan 14 88.00 Satisfactory 15 Jul...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388

    Original file (BC 2013 03388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.” The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05047

    Original file (BC-2012-05047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 12 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The fitness monitor incorrectly counted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05369

    Original file (BC 2012 05369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that the applicant provided a memorandum from the Director, Fitness and Sports Complex at Kadena Air Base, Japan which states her staff was aware of the manufacturer’s guidance that HR monitors can cause erratic readings and have previously separated walkers after crossing the finish line to keep their distance to avoid syncing with other HR monitors worn by other walkers. After he completed the cardio component of the FA, he had a 20 minute argument with three of the FACs and...