RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03921
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, reflect Regional Equipment Operator Training School.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He attended the Regional Equipment Operators Training School and
was licensed in five pieces of heavy equipment. He also attended
supervisor training classes which are also missing from his
records.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Illinois Air National Guard on
16 May 1985.
On 15 May 1991, the applicant was honorably discharged in the
grade of sergeant under the provisions of ANGR 39-10, Expiration
Term of Service. He served 6 years of total service for pay.
On 19 October 2012, AFPC/DPSIT advised the applicant to provide
additional documentation or evidence showing completion of his
formal training at Regional Equipment Operators Training School
to include the course length and graduation date - within
30 days. Any official certificate or source document showing
these requirements would suffice. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states no documents were
included with the applicants package to support the corrective
action requested. No documentation reviewed in the applicants
records state completion of Regional Equipment Operator Training
School.
The DPSIT complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 21 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03921 in Executive Session on 26 March 2013, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03921 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 August 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 14 January 2013,
w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 January 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04281
DPAPPO states IAW DoDI 1300.19, DoD Joint Officer Management Program, in order to be appointed a Level II Joint Qualified Officer the officer must accrue 18 joint qualification points or have been awarded full joint duty credit and successfully completed JPME I. A further check of the Joint Officer Management Information System (JMIS) and Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) verify this fact. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIM recommends granting relief sought by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05563
Failure to submit the required documentation or obtain retainability in a timely manner would result in a disapproval of an application for transferability. On 7 April 2010, the applicant was sent another email stating that his TEB had expired because he did not get the required retainability. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02666
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: 1. Per applicable Department of Defense and Air Force Instructions, participation in contingency operations, but not geographic locations, are allowed to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00075
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide documentation to validate that he attended Ammunition School, although his WD AGO Form 53-54 did say he attended Ordnance School in Lansing Michigan...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03013
Item 41 of the applicants DD Form 214 labeled; Service Schools Attended reflects None. On 23 September 2011 AFPC/DPSIT requested the applicant provide additional documentation or evidence to show completion of the courses. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did not have copies of records of the schools he attended. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05307 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect that he was awarded a 7-skill level in Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A5X1 (Aircraft Maintenance). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest level of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03582
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty, or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record; most notably, that the applicant was sent a notice to specify the number of months he wished to transfer to each dependent...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03010
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03010 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be able to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his children. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03185
__________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon completion of Basic Training he completed B-47 Bomber training after approximately six months. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01856
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice....