RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03823
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 December 2012 be removed
from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not fail the FA; his run time was incorrectly written
down. While trying to fix this error the fitness staff had
already entered the score in the system and stated it could not
be removed once in the system.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
staff sergeant.
The applicants last five FA scores are as follows:
DATE SCORE
13 January 2011 SATISIFACTORY
13 July 2011 EXEMPT
* 15 December 2011 UNSATISFACTORY
18 January 2012 SATISFACTORY
16 August 2012 UNSATISFACTORY
*Contested FA score.
On 31 August 2012, DPSIM advised the applicant to provide
additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim
(i.e., signed fitness assessment score sheet and fitness
questionnaire) within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 31 August 2012, a
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional
documentation. The applicant did not respond.
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2.1, the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) is
responsible for the administration of FA for all members
assigned. According to paragraph 1.20.2.5, FAC documents FA
results on a hard copy score sheet, signs the score sheet, and
obtains members signature on the score sheet, acknowledging
run/walk time, abdominal circumference measurements, and muscular
fitness repetitions. Note, member must acknowledge run/walk
time before the FAC can enter the data into AFFMS. The applicant
did not provide evidence that indicates the run-time was
documented incorrectly, nor contested at time of FA.
The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 25 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days
(Exhibit B). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is
in error or unjust. The statement provided from his Unit Fitness
Program Manager is noted; however, in the absence of a signed
fitness assessment score sheet and signed fitness questionnaire,
we find insufficient evidence to warrant disturbing the record.
However, should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be
willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above and in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03823 in Executive Session on 26 March 2013, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03823 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 August 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 January 2013,
w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 January 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04277 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). IAW AFI 36-2905, paragraph 1.20.2.5, FAC documents FA results on a hard copy score sheet, signs the score sheet, and obtains members...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04056
The evidence provided by the applicant did not include medical provider recommended exemptions for the cardio component. If the medical evaluation validates the illness or injury and provides supporting medical documentation, the Unit Commander may invalidate the FA results by notifying the FAC in writing. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04102
A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide documentation from the FAC personnel stating the scores were entered into AFFMS incorrectly or provide the original score sheet. The applicants last six FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 12 Sep 13 90.89 Excellent (Exempt from SU) 7 Aug 12 94.20 Excellent 22 Jun 11 91.30 Excellent 29 Apr 11 86.50 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) *3 Oct...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02692
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A list of the applicants last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 26 Jul 2013 79.30 Satisfactory *30 Apr 2013 36.50 Unsatisfactory 12 Oct 2012 81.90 Satisfactory 3 Oct 2012 71.60 Unsatisfactory 15 May 2012 Exempt Exempt *Contested FA On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 10 Sep 09, 10 Dec 09, 31 Aug 10, 13 Oct 10, and 16 Feb 11, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS); in the alternative, his records be corrected to reflect he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846
The airman indicates the applicant completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. He again entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. In this respect, we note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02468
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02468 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 Nov 12, which resulted in a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and consequent discharge board, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...