Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01938
Original file (BC-2011-01938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01938 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple 
Heart (PH) medal. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was injured during ejection while on a bombing mission in Jul 
67. 

 

He believes “it is not intended that such a strict interpretation 
of the requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct 
result of hostile action be taken that it would preclude the 
award being made to deserving personnel.” 

 

Commanders must also take into consideration the circumstances 
surrounding an injury even if it appears to meet the criteria. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides an SF Form 502, Medical Record - Narrative Summary, dated 15 Jul 67. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty from 16 Nov 59 to 30 Jun 80, 
and was credited with 20 years, 7 months, and 15 days of active 
duty service, of which 5 years, 7 months and 25 days was Foreign 
Service. 

 

The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy 
actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat 
wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). In addition, it 
is necessary that the wound required or received treatment by 
medical personnel. Indirect injuries do not meet the criteria 
for award of the PH. These include, but are not limited to, 
injuries received while seeking shelter from mortar or rocket 
attacks, aircraft bombings, grenades, and injuries incurred while 
serving as an aircrew member or in a passenger status as a result 
of the aircraft’s evasive measures against hostile fire or Post-
Traumatic Stress Disorder. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDR states the applicant does 
not meet the criteria for award of the PH. The applicant’s SF 
Form 502, states he was “ejected from a B52 on 7 Jul 67 following 
an in-air collision with another B52” and transferred from 
Southeast Asia to Anderson AFB, Guam to recover from his injury. 
The applicant’s Officer Effectiveness Report (OER) covering 
17 May 67 to 16 Nov 67, also confirms he was involved in a mid-
air collision while on temporary duty (TDY) in Southeast Asia. 
However, there is no official documentation verifying the mid-air 
collision or the applicant’s injuries were caused by direct enemy 
action nor does the applicant claim his injury was due to direct 
enemy action. 

 

The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

According to his interpretation of Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22, Military Awards, dated 11 Dec 06, the provisions of Section 1130 
of Title 10, United States Code, allows for the consideration of 
awards not previously considered or the upgrade of decorations 
previously approved. 

 

Additional documentation of the mid air collision can be found in 
a book titled “We Were Crew Dogs.” 

 

According to AR 600-8-22, examples of injuries or wounds which 
clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows: 
Accidents, to include explosives, aircraft, vehicular, and other 
accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action; 
however, he contends that he would not have been on that mission 
if the enemy had not stored munitions in their target area to be 
used against their troops. 

 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and his response to 
the Air Force evaluation, we are not persuaded that he has been 


the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions 
are duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and 
by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale 
provided by the Air Force. The personal sacrifice the applicant 
endured for his country is noted and our decision in no way 
diminishes the high regard we have for his service; however, 
insufficient documentary evidence has been presented to 
substantiate that he has a qualifying injury that warrants award 
of the PH. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-01938 in Executive Session on 22 Sep 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 May 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 11 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Aug 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03124

    Original file (BC-2011-03124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). On 20 Sep 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to four Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and their action...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00738

    Original file (BC-2007-00738.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02039

    Original file (BC-2011-02039.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant has provided medical documentation verifying that he received shrapnel wounds due to two grenades exploding at a squadron party on 23 Jun 71, the Line of Duty Determination, dated 23 Jun 71, states it is not known who caused the grenades to go off. The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 22 Jul 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01511

    Original file (BC-2010-01511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for a service-connected wound in Nadzab, New Guinea. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02381

    Original file (BC-2011-02381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDRA states the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions, (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). DPSIDRA indicates that the applicant has not provided a detailed personal account, medical documentation verifying he received a wound as a direct result of enemy action that required medical treatment, and eye witness statement(s) to help support his claim. We note that although the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02555

    Original file (BC-2007-02555.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). In addition, it is necessary that the wound have required treatment by medical personnel. In regard to the applicant’s request for award of the PH, the Board notes the evidence of record supports the fact that the injuries he sustained on 21 Dec 66 were the result of an aircraft accident and not a direct result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03436

    Original file (BC-2011-03436.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was injured during a rocket attack while serving in Vietnam. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant's request for award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02141

    Original file (BC-2011-02141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFM 900-3, during the period in question, the Purple Heart (PH) was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy, or as a direct result of an act of any enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile foreign force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03970

    Original file (BC-2011-03970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH Medal is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, force aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial noting the applicant’s injuries do not meet the criteria for award of the PH Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01114

    Original file (BC-2010-01114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was wounded and not awarded the PH. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...