RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01901
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason of fraudulent entry into military service
be changed to erroneous.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes the narrative reason is erroneous because his
recruiter told him to withhold his past medical history from the
Air Force.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a written
statement, copy of his DD Form 214 Certificate of Discharge from
Active Duty, an AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for
Separation and other supporting documentation.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 08 February
2011. On 21 April 2011, the applicant was notified of his
commanders intent to discharge him from the Air Force for
defective enlistment: fraudulent entry into military service.
Specifically, the applicant did not meet the medical requirements
to enlist.
On 21 April 2011, the applicant acknowledged his commanders
intent to discharge him. He also acknowledged his right to
consult counsel and submit statements on his behalf: he accepted
an appointment with the Area Defense Counsel and submitted
statements for consideration. On 2 May 2011 the commander
directed the applicant be separated with an entry level
separation. His service was uncharacterized and his narrative
reason for separation was listed as fraudulent entry into
military service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/SGPS recommends denial. SGPS states the applicant failed to
disclose major medical issues at the time of his accession
examination. Had they been disclosed he would have been found
disqualified for military service. The separation was in
accordance with established policy and administrative procedures.
Since the applicant did not meet and currently does not meet
medical criteria for military duty, they do not support a change
to his separation code.
The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the discharge to
include the narrative reason for separation was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
instruction and was within the discretion of discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors
or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He
provided no facts warranting a change in his narrative reason for
separation.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
__________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 4 November 2011 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion. Therefore, we
find no basis to favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-01901 in Executive Session on 12 January 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 May 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 5 August 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 13 October 2011.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 November 2011.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02622
Block 28 Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from Fraudulent Entry into Military Service to read Erroneous Enlistment _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicants eight-page statement is summarized as follows: 1) During the first meeting with her Air Force recruiter, the applicant disclosed her bee and penicillin allergies. Her recruiter instructed her that she did not need to disclose this information when she...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service and Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, Approved Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01630
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicants request to change her narrative reason for separation and separation code. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of her enlistment, she would not have been allowed entry into the military. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04111
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The notification memorandum he received from his commander on 22 Mar 2010 was the first time he heard the term "fraudulent entry." Since the possibility exists the applicant did in fact answer the questions honestly, we recommend any and all references in his record pertaining to fraudulent enlistment" or a preexisting condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03351
Based upon the physicians findings, the applicant was notified by her commander of his intent to recommend her for an uncharacterized entry-level separation based on fraudulent entry, under the provisions of Air Force Program Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.15 under Basis for Discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03930
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 5 Jul 11. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00396
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00396 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be changed from an erroneous enlistment to a medical discharge. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04381
Specifically, it was discovered he had a history of migraine headaches. DPSOS states the documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for the discharge and the applicants entry level separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02332
The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and the applicant's entry level service characterization. The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of his request for a change his RE code, stating, the RE code of 2C is driven by his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. On 11 Aug 2011, HQ AETC/SGPS validated the applicant's discharge processing, but state they support a change of the RE code to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01674 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service) along with the corresponding separation code of JDA be changed to Secretarial Authority. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...