RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01812
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His entry level separation be changed to general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He honorably served his country while in the Air Force.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal
statement.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 March 2011.
The applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to
recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the
provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section 5C,
paragraph 5.15. The specific reason was that the applicant had a
history of mental health treatment that was not documented. Had
the Air Force known, it could have rendered him ineligible to
enlist in the Air Force.
He was advised of his rights in this matter and acknowledged
receipt of the notification. The applicant waived his right to
consult with counsel and waived his right to submit statements in
his own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the
assistant staff judge advocate found the case legally sufficient
and recommended an entry level separation.
On 28 March 2011, the discharge authority concurred with the
recommendation and directed discharge. The applicant was
discharged on 29 March 2011 with an entry level separation.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the
discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did not
submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that
occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts
warranting a change to his separation code, reentry code or his
narrative reason for separation.
The DPSOS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 19 August 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2011-01812 in Executive Session on 4 January 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01812 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 2011, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 28 July 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 August 2011.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01812
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008- 01812 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) of code 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be changed to allow her renter into military service. We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03186 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1 series code that would allow him to reenlist. DPSOS states airman are given entry...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04471
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and medical documentation. He provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05130
The applicant did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of his discharge warranting a change to his type of discharge or character of service. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 23 March 2012 for review and comment within 30 days. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02146
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02146 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00633
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00633 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and narrative reason for separation be removed from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. During the evaluation, the applicant self-reported he struggled with symptoms of anger and depression since...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02958
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02958 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service be changed from uncharacterized. On 21 May 1997, the discharge authority recommended approval of his discharge. As of this date, this office has not received a response.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00481
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the narrative reason for separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: He was set up for failure by the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02467
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02467 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow her to reenlist. The application was timely filed. ...