Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01895
Original file (BC-2011-01895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01895 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His record be corrected to reflect that he selected Survivor 
Benefit Plan for his spouse within a year of their marriage. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He sent a letter with his marriage certificate to the Defense 
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). A year later he received 
his Retiree Account Statement (RAS) and noticed that his wife 
was not added to receive SBP. He reapplied for SBP but was 
informed that the first anniversary of his marriage was past and 
his request was not valid. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant has not provided any 
supporting documentation. 

 

His complete submission is at exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force (exhibit B). Accordingly, there is no need to recite 
these facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial. DPSIAR states a member who is 
unmarried at retirement may elect coverage for the first spouse 
acquired after retirement; however, the election must be made 
before the first anniversary of the marriage. If a member fails 
to make an election before then, SBP coverage for that person or 


another person of that category may be elected only if congress 
authorizes an open enrollment period. 

 

The DFAS records reflect the applicant was not married, but had 
eligible children and elected child only SBP coverage based on 
full retired pay prior to his 1 January 1987 retirement. The 
youngest child lost eligibility due to age and SBP premiums 
ceased effective 1 July 1992. The applicant married his wife on 
17 December 2009, but failed to notify DFAS of the change to his 
marital status or request SBP coverage be established on his 
wife’s behalf within the first year of their marriage. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIAR evaluation is at exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 24 June 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, this office has not received a response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note that 
should Congress declare an open enrollment period the applicant 
will have an opportunity to elect coverage. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 


 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-01895 in Executive Session on 14 February 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 19 May 2011. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 15 June 2011. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 June 2011 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05023

    Original file (BC-2011-05023.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, they were married on 3 Jan 2011. In order for a spouse, who married a member after his/her retirement, to be considered eligible for the SBP annuity, the post-retirement marriage must endure for one full year from the date of marriage. Although the applicant provides evidence that recognizes their relationship as a marriage, the law requires a member to be married for one full year before the widow is eligible for SBP payments, assuming the member...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03740

    Original file (BC-2008-03740.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The personnel advising him at the time he secured a military identification for his wife should have informed him of benefits available under the SBP. Under the SBP program, the law authorized enrollment periods 1 Mar 99 to 29 Feb 00 and 1 Oct 05 to 30 Sep 06, for retired member to elect SBP coverage. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02880

    Original file (BC-2010-02880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s record be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The decedent and the applicant were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02043

    Original file (BC 2012 02043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: While married, the member elected spouse and child coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay under the SBP prior to his 1 Jun 73 retirement. There is no record of marriage at the time of his death. While counsel argues the former member never married; the evidence of record, specifically, the death certificate states otherwise.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02805

    Original file (BC 2010 02805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy of his 6 March 2008 letter to DFAS in which he claims he had requested SBP coverage be established for his wife “by the middle of June 2005.” However, DFAS records contain no evidence he submitted a valid request to elect SBP coverage for his wife within the first year of marriage. DPSIAR indicates the applicant’s intentions to provide SBP coverage for his wife are clear and apparently sincere; however, specific and timely action is required to elect SBP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-04138

    Original file (BC-2009-04138.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS-CL received a letter from the former service member on 4 Nov 94, requesting SBP coverage be established on behalf of the applicant; however, he died on 20 Mar 95, seven months before the end of their first year of marriage. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04108

    Original file (BC-2010-04108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Apr 98, the applicant remarried and on 18 Nov 98, he notified DFAS to cancel spouse-only SBP coverage. The applicant’s 18 Nov 98 request was a valid request and clearly showed he did not want to reinstate SBP coverage after his marriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04376

    Original file (BC-2011-04376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his retirement from the Air Force, the decedent was divorced from his previous spouse and elected child only SBP coverage. Title 10, USC Section 1448(a)(3)(A), permits a member, who is not married at the time of retirement and who later marries, to provide SBP spouse coverage within the first year of marriage. ________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02486

    Original file (BC-2012-02486.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the member fails to elect SBP coverage for an eligible beneficiary within the time prescribed by law, coverage may be provided only in the event Congress authorizes open enrollment. He failed to submit a valid request to elect SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf within the time prescribed by law. It is the member’s right and responsibility to elect SBP coverage for a spouse acquired after retirement.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03362

    Original file (BC 2007 03362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member and the applicant were allegedly married in Tijuana, Mexico on 8 Jun 82, and he elected spouse only coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay during the open enrollment authorized by Public Law (PL) 97-35 (1 Oct 81 – 30 Sep 82). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has recommended that we consider voiding the decedent's 23 Sep 82 election for SBP coverage for the applicant, suggesting that the "erroneous deductions of SBP premiums for spouse coverage be refunded...