RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01932
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes he earned the DFC during a bombing mission on
21 March 1945 while assigned to the 303rd Bomb Group. However,
the crew aboard his aircraft was not recommended by his former
commander based on an established policy at the time.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of a DFC
award recommendation package, submitted through a Member of
Congress, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code
(USC), Section 1130.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Army Air Corps who served
on active duty from 14 December 1942 to 30 October 1945. He
served as a B-17 Pilot and was honorably discharged from the Air
Force Reserve effective 8 November 1956 in the grade of captain
(O-3).
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants
available master personnel records are contained in the
evaluation by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDR makes no recommendation. DPSIDR states that in
accordance with Department of Defense Manual 1348.33, Volume II,
the DFC may be awarded to any persons who, after 6 April 1917,
while serving in any capacity with the United States Armed
Forces, distinguished themselves by heroism or extraordinary
achievement while participating in aerial flight.
Recommendations for decorations must be submitted within two
years and presented within three years of the act,
accomplishment, or service performed. However, under the 1996
NDAA, Section 526 (now Title 10, USC, Section 1130), which was
enacted into law on 10 February 1996, this timeline has been
waived. Under this Act, the original or reconstructed written
award recommendation is required for the recommended individual.
The recommendation must be made by someone, other than the member
himself, preferably the commander or supervisor at the time of
the act or achievement, with firsthand knowledge of the members
accomplishments. Any statements from fellow comrades, eyewitness
statements attesting to the act, sworn affidavits, and other
documentation substantiating the recommendation should be
included in the package. Requests, which have not been
previously been submitted in a timely manner, will be considered
under the provisions of this Act if the request has been referred
to the appropriate Secretary concerned by a Member of Congress.
DPSIDR indicates the applicant has provided all required
documentation in accordance with directives for consideration for
award of the DFC under the provision of NDAA, Section 526, and is
submitted for the Boards consideration.
The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 19 June 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting the
award of the DFC. In this respect, we note the applicants
evident accomplishments as stated in his proposed DFC citation,
which is verified by witness statements from former crew members.
The applicant asserts that his crew was not recommended for the
DFC due to the policy of his group commander at the time,
although other group commanders for similar units did not follow
a similar policy. We are aware that award policy during the
period in question varied considerably between the Numbered Air
Forces (NAF) and between the groups associated with the NAFs. As
such, based on the applicants verifiable act of extraordinary
achievement while participating in aerial flight, it appears he
was not treated equally with others similarly situated. In our
view, it would be in the interest of equity and justice to award
the applicant the DFC for his service to the Nation. Therefore,
we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was
awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary
achievement, while participating in aerial flight as a B-17
aircraft commander, Crew 44-6516, 360th Bombardment Squadron,
303d Bombardment Group, Headquarters Eighth Air Force, on 1 March
1945.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01932 in Executive Session on 24 January 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
01932 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Apr 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 8 Aug 11, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Aug 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04215
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He states the DFC was awarded to a member of his crew who may have found documentation for one particular mission 19 Oct 44. As such, based on the applicants verifiable act of extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight, we believe it would be in the interest of equity and justice to award the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01224
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01224 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). While there is no evidence to indicate that during the period in question, the Fifteenth Air Force awarded the DFC for sustained operational activities, i.e., number of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02052
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02052 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02299
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02299 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02255 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two Distinguished Flying Crosses (DFCs), an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM), and the Army Commendation Medal (ACM). In this...
He also completed three missions as a B-17F navigator. During World War II, the 8th Air Force had an established policy whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 30 combat flight missions and an AM was awarded upon the completion of five missions. In 1944, the 8th Air Force required completion of 30 combat flight missions; however, the applicant did not complete 30 missions.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00357
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00357 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05942
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: SAF/MRBP recommends denial noting the applicant did not provide supporting evidence such as his flight records, crew member logs, or DFC narrative or citation. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is at Exhibit...