RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-01893
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His physical fitness test score performed on 6 April 2011 be
removed from his record.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not given a valid Air Force Form 422, Notification of Air
Force Members Qualification Status, to address his fitness
following the release of a medical evaluation indicating he
suffered from a condition of having seizures. He failed a
physical fitness waist measurement on 6 April 2011 by not
achieving a passing score. He feels he was hindered by his
medical condition because he was not able to perform all three
exercise components of the physical fitness test. After talking
to his Primary Care Physician (PCM) about his concerns, he was
told that if he provided an Air Force Form 108, Physical Fitness
Education and Intervention Processing, she would sign it
indicating he had a previous medical condition which precluded
him from achieving a passing score. However, he has not received
an Air Force Form 422, for the purpose of physical fitness
testing, to date.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
Air Force Form 108.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently a member of the Regular Air Force
serving in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants
military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states that all procedures
regarding the applicants exemption process were correctly
followed. The applicant was given an Air Force Form 469, Duty
Limiting Condition Report, dated 4 March 2011, which cleared him
for return to duty. The applicants 6 April 2011 Fitness
Assessment (FA) was administered based on a valid Air Force Form
422, which exempted him from all components except the abdominal
circumference (AC). The applicant has failed to provide evidence
to indicate he was exempt from the AC measurement. Therefore,
the FA is valid and the score should remain in the system.
On 6 April 2011, the applicants PCM signed an Air Force Form
108, indicating the applicant has a medical condition that
precludes the achievement of a passing fitness score.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 1 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01893 in Executive Session on 24 January 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01893:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 May 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, USAF/A1PP, dated 24 Jun 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01118
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score he received on 31 Jan 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was exempt from 3 of the 4...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787
The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03673
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. Since the applicant was not exempt from the AC component, his AC measurement of 38.5 inches (at the time of the FA in question) was greater than the 37.5 inches required when all components are exempt except AC. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01410
To support his appeal the applicant provides an AF FM 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status; multiple Standard FM 600s, Record of Medical Care, reflecting that he saw his Primary Care Manager (PCM) numerous times about neck and back pain starting from 11 Mar 10 to 12 Mar 2012; two memoranda from his radiologist indicating the applicant had a medical issue with his spine; and a Physician Discharge Summary. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04664
The complete AFPC/DPSIDE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His chronic medical condition affected his Physical Training (PT). The applicant contends his chronic back pain precluded him from passing four fitness assessments (FA) and ultimately resulted in him receiving the contested referral enlisted performance report (EPR). While the applicant has provided a supporting statement from...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03457
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, the provider will specify the length of time required for physical limitations. While the applicant submitted a memorandum from the medical provider, it did not state the medical conditions contributed to his failed FA. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Jun 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592
from the Unit CC; and Atch 1, Para 13 If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results. The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00 Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50 Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50 Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00 Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00 Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...