RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01805
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be credited with four (4) additional points for the
Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 30 Jul 09.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During this time frame, he was commuting from Iowa to his
Reserve unit in Arizona. His unit was combining their unit
training assembly (UTA) weekend drills to save on travel cost;
however, the July UTA was rescheduled and he was not able to
make up the weekend drills until Aug 09, which was after his RYE
of 30 Jul 09. He was misadvised by his commander that his Aug
09 drill would carry over and he would be credited with a good
year.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a
computer printout, Service History, dated 4 Mar 09 and his
AF Form 40A, Record of Individual Inactive Duty Training, dated
4 Aug 09.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the RYE of 30 Jul 09, the applicant was credited with
15 active duty points, 16 inactive duty training points, and
15 membership points, totaling 46 points.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends approval, stating, in part, that even
though the applicant did not complete a year of satisfactory
federal service for RYE 30 Jul 09, his participation timing was
mainly due to his unit's decision to combine the Jul and Aug 09
UTAs and apparently not to oversight or poor planning on his
part. The applicant's participation record shows that he
consistently exceeded minimum participation requirements. In
fact, RYE 30 Jul 09 is the only year of unsatisfactory service
he has in nine years of Reserve service. By all accounts, the
applicant acted in good faith, followed the direction of unit
leadership and performed his inactive duty training as
scheduled.
The complete ARPC/DPTS evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 16 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting
corrective action. The Air Force office of primary
responsibility has adequately addressed the issues presented by
the applicant and we are in agreement with its recommendation to
grant the requested relief. As such, we recommend the applicant
be entitled to four additional non-paid inactive duty training
points for a satisfactory year of credit during the Retirement
Year Ending 30 Jul 09. Accordingly, we recommend the
applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that for
Retention/Retirement Year 31 July 2008 through 30 July 2009 he
was credited with an additional four (4) non-paid inactive duty
training (IDT) points resulting in 50 total points; and, this
period was a year of satisfactory Federal service.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01805 in Executive Session on 26 January 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 May 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 12 Aug 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02819
In addition, the applicant did not perform the duty in RYE 3 Nov 09, he performed it in RYE Nov 08. To receive the participation credit he requests he would have been required to perform the duty between 4 Nov 08 and 3 Nov 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02819 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01030
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his transfer from active duty to the Air Force Reserve, the Military Personnel Flight advised him that by completing his normal training requirement he would be able to acquire enough points to be credited with a good year. The well-intentioned course of action led to an unsatisfactory year of service for RYE Feb 96. Accordingly, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02094
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02094 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement year ending 23 June 2011 be changed from an unsatisfactory Federal service year to a satisfactory Federal service year by moving his 6 and 7 March 2010 Unit Training Assembly (UTA) points to 10 and 11 July 2010. The relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for duty he performed in Feb 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01725
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01725 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited for pay and points for Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) he completed during the months of Feb, Mar, Apr, and May 2008. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02524
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial, they found no error or injustice nor did the applicant provide any evidence to support his claim. The applicant did not provide any documentation to show a professional opinion of a qualified military medical personnel and evaluation for performance was accomplished as required in accordance with ANGI 36-2001. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02100
The applicant was credited with the proper active and inactive duty points. Moreover, the source documents provided by the applicant, verify active duty points were correctly recorded on the point credit summaries and did not refute the existing inactive duty points. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Reserve Personnel Center and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.