RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01428
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and
Record of Service be corrected as follows:
1. Item 10a - Net Service This Period reflect approximately one
year of part time service.
2. Character of Service be changed from General Under Honorable
Conditions to Honorable.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was never full time active duty with the National Guard. His
status was part time and he only attended for one year. This
error adds over 1000 retirement points to his records. It will
cause him to be overpaid when he starts drawing retirement pay.
He discovered this error after becoming a unit administrator for
the Army Reserve and learning to understand the NGB Form 22
better. Regarding the characterization of service; he is
currently serving in the Army Reserve and feels that an upgrade
to an honorable discharge is merited as he has completed almost
three years of his current enlistment and is correcting the
mistakes he made when he was younger.
In support of his request, the applicant submits his NGB Form 22
and Department of the Army (DA) Form 200, Transmittal Record.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard on
1 December 1992.
On 2 December 1995, via certified letter, the commander notified
the applicant that she was recommending him for discharge under
the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3209,
Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and
Air Force Reserve Members based upon 112 periods of unexcused
absences. The applicant failed to acknowledge receipt of the
commanders intent to discharge him. Subsequent to the file
being found legally sufficient the discharge authority approved
the recommendation and directed that the applicant be
involuntarily discharged for unsatisfactory participation. The
applicant was discharged effective 23 February 1996 and was
credited with a net service of 3 years, 2 months, and 23 days.
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1POE recommends denial. A1POE states the service time in
item 10a of the NGB Form 22 is correct. The time merely
reflects the period of his last enlistment without regard to
whether or not it was served satisfactorily. He will only
receive service credit, for pay, for the periods of satisfactory
participation. The NGB Form 22 was completed correctly. A1POE
does not support the request to change the character of service
to honorable. The characterization he received was appropriate
based on the reason for separation. There is insufficient
justification to support a change of his service
characterization to honorable.
The complete NGB/A1POE evaluation is at exhibit C.
NGB/A1PS recommends denial and concurs with NGB/A1POE.
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at exhibit D
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the member
on 24 June 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has not received a response
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-01428 in Executive Session on 14 February 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 April 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1POE, dated 3 June 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 3 June 2011.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 June 2011.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 6U (Not Selected for Retention by Commander) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. So should he desire to enlist with another ANG unit, it will not be a barrier to his enlistment. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6H, which denotes Pending Discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 Involuntary (ANG Only), be removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03610
This time enclosed was a NGB 22, stating that he was discharged with 5 years and 11 days of service and that he was eligible for reenlistment into the Armed Forces. After reviewing the applicants discharge notification package, dated 22 Mar 06, it was validated that the member was recommended for discharge for failing to maintain contact with the unit to schedule a date to attend BMT or attend Unit Training Assembly (UTA) weekends, which constituted substandard performance on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04257
The A1PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 23 March 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01133
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 December 2010, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04167
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04167 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As such, the applicant was erroneously separated from the Air National Guard and incurred a debt for his reenlistment bonus. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a member of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04184
A1POE states, in accordance with the applicants point credit summary, he did not participate in enough UTA days from his initial enlistment date of 20 Sep 2008 to the date of the erroneous discharge, on 1 Aug 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00209
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be changed to one that will allow him to re-enter the military. The Medical Consultant lauds the applicants desire to once again serve, and the support he has received from his parents, an employer, his youth pastor, and a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04104
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit B. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00088
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POE does not provide a recommendation. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11.