Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01563
Original file (BC-2011-01563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01563 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His awarded Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his record. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The Bronze Star Medal was awarded to him after discharge; 
however, it was never entered into his record. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the 
award elements (citation and certificate for BSM) and other 
supporting documents. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force, on 10 May 65, 
for a period of four years. He was progressively promoted to 
the grade of sergeant (Sgt/E-4). 

 

On 4 Nov 68, the applicant was honorably released from active 
duty. He was credited with 3 years, 5 months, and 25 days of 
active duty service, including 1 year of foreign service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, that the 
official source document is the special order; however, no 
official document was provided or could be located in the 
applicant’s personnel record to verify entitlement to the BSM. 

 


Although there is strong evidence to support the applicant was 
awarded the BSM, they are unable to locate the official source 
document to substantiate the award. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 May 11 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action. We note the comments of the Air Force office 
of primary responsibility; nonetheless, the applicant provides a 
copy of the award elements and based on our own independent 
review, we were able to confirm the applicant was, in fact, 
awarded the Bronze Star medal. We have attached a copy of the 
special order awarding the applicant the BSM. Therefore, in 
view of the above, we recommend the applicant’s record be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States 
Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued 4 November 1968, Item 
24, Decorations, Medal, Badges, Commendations, Citations and 
Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized be amended to reflect 
award of the Bronze Star Medal. 

 

 b. That Special Order G-3671, issued on 
27 November 1968, be accepted for file in his official record. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01563 in Executive Session on 15 November 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Apr 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 19 May 1911. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01235

    Original file (BC-2011-01235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing the applicant’s military service record and the submission by the applicant, there was no official source document found to verify his entitlement to the BSM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05123

    Original file (BC-2011-05123.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts are pertaining to the application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award w/ Valor and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The applicant received an Air Force Commendation Medal for meritorious service for his 10 month...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00074

    Original file (BC-2012-00074.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. However, based on his submission of the original signed citation, we believe reasonable doubt has been established that he was awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02465

    Original file (BC-2011-02465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDRA states the applicant was awarded the BSM for meritorious service from 6 Jan 66 to 24 Feb 67; however, the valor device is authorized only when the BSM is awarded for heroism. The applicant’s elements indicate he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service not heroism. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137

    Original file (BC-2007-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03747

    Original file (BC-2011-03747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03747 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: a. Award of the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Philippine Defense Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03577

    Original file (BC-2011-03577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also recognizes single acts of merit and meritorious service if the achievement or service is of a lesser degree than that deemed worthy of the Legion of Merit; but such service must have been accomplished with distinction. The applicant did not provide a proposed citation and one was not located in his MPR The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02920

    Original file (BC-2010-02920.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02920 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01560

    Original file (BC-2011-01560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03887

    Original file (BC-2010-03887.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Mistakes were made while processing his BSM recommendation that no one was willing to correct, which resulted in him being awarded the MSM instead of the BSM. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, other than his own assertions, he has provided no evidence the action to downgrade his recommendation for a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) first oak leaf cluster (1 OLC) was the result of an error on...