RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01513
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His entitlement for shipping household goods (HHGs) be reinstated
and he receive an extension to have his HHGs shipped to his home
state.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in
2008, and stayed near Keesler AFB while receiving medical care.
In 2010, he moved his family to a new home and was reimbursed for
the personally procured move (PPM). He has since moved back to
his home state to seek alternative forms of medical treatment
which were not offered at the other medical facilities. He needs
his wife with him to assist with his daily care. He is
unemployed and cannot afford to move his family. He is willing
to repay the monies he received for local move in order for his
shipping entitlement to be reinstated.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Per Special Order ACD-01855, dated 11 Aug 2008, the applicant was
placed on the TDRL, effective 6 Sep 2008.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ECAF recommends denial noting the applicant exhausted his
shipping entitlement when he performed a local PPM and received
reimbursement. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR)
Volume 1, reflects that service members placed on the TDRL have
one year from the effective date of retirement in which to effect
movement of HHG from their current or previous duty station to a
Home of Selection anywhere in the United States. An extension of
one year may be granted for service members undergoing medical
treatment, pursuing education or training, or other deserving
cases. The JFTR advises that HHG transportation must not be made
for the service members convenience to some other place for re-
transportation later.
The complete ECAF evaluation is Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 29 Jul 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our decision the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief requested.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01513 in Executive Session on 6 Dec 2011 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Apr 2011.
Exhibit B. Applicants Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, PPA HQ ECAF, dated 21 Jul 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 2011.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02500
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the necessary documentation for approval of the personally procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) during a permanent change of station (PCS) move. ECAF states the applicant indicates he should be reimbursed for three primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01499
The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-it-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $19,524.78 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $12,331.44. ECAF recommends the applicant be reimbursed for any funds personally expended in excess of the authorized GCC.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03947
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/CCC recommends approval. Based on information in the case file, it appears erroneous information received regarding authorization for shipment prior to issuance of orders resulted in an injustice against the applicant, and their office concurs that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00539
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00539 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive full reimbursement of $2,449.21 for expenses he incurred as a result of his Personally Procured Move (PPM) and his PPM reimbursement entitlement be extended back to time of his move. On 18 January 2011, the applicant submitted a DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01263
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit B. JFTR paragraph U5012-I further clarifies that an extension must not be authorized for approval for more than six years from the date of separation or release from active duty unless a member’s certified ongoing medical condition prevents relocation of the member for longer than six years from the retirement date. Based on the above, they believe an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01953
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The date of the order assigning him from Kunsan Air Base, Korea, to Dover Air Force Base (AFB), Delaware (DE) be changed from 30 August 2012 to 20 July 2012 so he can receive reimbursement for moving his family and household goods (HHG) from Virginia (VA) to Delaware (DE). Amended Order AG-033513, dated 11 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00053
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends granting relief, indicating sufficient evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Additionally, Personal Property Headquarters (PPA HQ) advisories PPA-10-0034 and PPA 13-0045, dated 16 Apr 10 and 5 Jun 13, respectively,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03475
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA/ECAF recommends approval. Incident to the PCS, the applicant effected a shipment of HHG at government expense, and personally arranged to ship his motorcycle to the Philippines. However, the motorcycle qualifies as HHG and he was authorized to ship it to the Philippines as HHG.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02292
The applicant states he was reimbursed fully for his move from Seymour Johnson to his home of record, but not for his move from his home of record to the Academy. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AF/DPDFP recommends the applicant be reimbursed a total of $82.15 for the shipment of items from his home of record to the Academy. However, the Board agrees with the recommendation by HQ AF/DPDFP to reimburse the applicant in the amount of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03079
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03079 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his personally procured move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Traffic Management Office (TMO), or in the alternative cover the actual cost of the PPM. He was only compensated $8,370.24, which did not cover the total move...