AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02354
He was serving in the grade of master sergeant and, while he served a total of 24 years, 8 months, and 15 days for pay, his satisfactory service for Reserve retired pay was computed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) as 19 years, 10 months, and 17 days. A1POF notes the applicant has over 20 years of service and that he was discharged with Severance Pay (DWSP). At the time of his discharge, he was briefed on a choice between DWSP or Reserve retirement at age 60.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02361
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. Complete copies of the applicant’s responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advised that prior to the start of the promotion cycle, CFMs are advised that if they feel it is appropriate for the suffix and “slick” AFSCs...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02365
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02368
DPPP states the applicant did not file an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. DPPP concludes the applicant did not provide any documentation to support his case. DPPP’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 1 November 2005, the applicant provided his detailed refutations regarding the recommendations of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02370
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02370 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 31 November 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be changed to show promotion to staff sergeant and a medical retirement. BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02379
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02379 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Feb 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02382
After boarding an aircraft he grabbed the hand of another individual to assist him in boarding the aircraft. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Oct 05 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02386
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He contends he was appointed as a USAF Academy Liaison Officer in the December 1985/January 1986 time frame, and has 23 years of satisfactory service. Therefore, DPP states the applicant is not eligible for Reserve retired pay, or any benefits associated with retired pay since he did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service. Records indicate he has not met the requirement of earning 20...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02388
He believed he was declining only the option of the six-year enlistment when he initialed in Section E of the Air Force Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-02388 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02389
Applicant states he did not receive urgent, timely treatment and medical care to correct his right shoulder and neck condition. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant states he has discovered errors in the BCMR Medical Consultant’s assessment of the facts and is providing additional documentation to support his request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02390
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from her military personnel record. At the time the applicant was being evaluated in the Air Force disability evaluation system, her depression and hypothyroidism were not separately unfitting and did not warrant a separate rating from the rating for fatigue. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe she has suffered from an...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02394
In support of the application, the applicant submits his separation document, a letter from AFLSA/ADC, copies of support letters (3), and copies of documentation from his military personnel record. On 13 August 1997, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve and accepted for enlistment in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic for a period of four years. The applicant was honorably discharged on 12 September 2001 for completion of required active service with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02404
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02412
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/RSS states that based on the information they have reviewed, they do not find there is sufficient evidence to award the applicant her request to adjust her enlistment grade. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 October 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02419
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02424
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force, he was not eligible for award of the AFRR; however, per the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) Awards and Decorations Division, members in the included message can receive award of the AFRR if they won one of the categories since the ribbon’s inception. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02425
The Article 15 was removed from the member’s Officer Selection Record; however, it was not removed from the member’s Master Personnel Record. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MRB SUBJECT: I have carefully considered the rationale of the Board majority; however, I agree with the minority member of the panel that applicant’s Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period closing 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02426
The investigating officer concluded that the applicant’s injuries were NLOD due to applicant’s own misconduct. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the application be denied. However, after a thorough review of the available evidence of record and the AFPC/JA opinion, we believe the applicant’s LOD was properly evaluated under the appropriate Air Force regulations.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02428
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02428 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4A be changed so that he can qualify for enlistment into the Regular Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02433
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states there is no indication in the applicant’s records that he was recommended or awarded the DFC with first through third OLC. HQ AFPC/DPPPR further stated the applicant’s one year service in Vietnam was verified by his DD Form 214 dated 26 February 1972. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02440
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02441
In support of his request applicant provided a copy of his original PRF and corrected PRF, a letter of support from his senior rater, AF Form 948, Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports and a letter from the Supplemental Management Level Review (MLR) President, and AFPC/DPPPE. AFPC/DPPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPP amended its previous Air Force evaluation to state the ERAB failed to consider the case after the AF...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02443
INDEX CODE: 110.00 AFBCMR BC-2005-02443 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02456
The following information has been extracted from the reconstructed records provided by the NPRC and the records provided by the applicant. The applicant was assigned to the 388th Bomb Group, 8th Air Force, in the European Theater of Operations as a B-17 “Flying Fortress” pilot, from 25 April 1944 through 30 June 1945, when he returned to the Continental United States. Since the record does not reveal nor has the applicant provided any evidence showing he served in a grade higher than...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02460
INDEX CODE: 131.04 BC-2005-02460 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02472
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends approval to restore 35 days of lost leave. The complete DPF evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAOO recommends denial to the applicant’s request to correct his separation and retirement dates to reflect 28 February 2005 and 1 March 2005, respectively. The Board notes the Force Shaping Program in force at that time stated phase II officers serving on active duty in the Limited EAD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02475
Only those individuals assigned to an IDMT 4N0X1C CAFSC position at the time of the conversion were considered for promotion as an IDMT in the CY05 cycle. We therefore conclude the fair and right thing to do is to recommend the 4N0X1C members be given supplemental consideration in the CAFSC 4N0X1 for the 05E6/05E7 promotion cycle. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02479
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02479 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 FEB 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and eligible...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02480
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he served during World War II from 24 March 1942 through 17 January 1946. He further states he is requesting an OLC not an additional medal (Exhibit E). After thoroughly reviewing the available personnel records, we found no evidence to verify he...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02486
An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. An extension of the time limit would apply only for the amount of time the member was confined in a medical facility or deemed to be unable to travel due to medical reasons that occurred during the first year. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02488 INDEX CODE: 125.00, 145.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 23 May 2003 discharge be revoked and he be allowed to remain on active duty with all pay and allowances until such time as HQ Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) has made a final determination regarding his medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02509
INDEX CODE: 110.02 BC-2005-02509 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02510
On 22 January 1988, his commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge due to his unsatisfactory performance, exceeding weight standards, according to Air Force Regulation 39-10, under the provisions of paragraph 5-26f. On 26 February 1988, the discharge authority accepted the conditional waiver and directed the applicant be honorably discharged without P&R The applicant was discharged effective 4 March 1988 with a honorable characterization of service, a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02511
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force historically awards the LOM to colonels and above while the MSM is awarded to lieutenant colonels and below. On 22 Mar 04, the Board considered and granted the applicant's request for consideration for promotion to the grade of colonel by an SSB. Applicant notes that in accordance with the AFI the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council is the approval authority, the entire career...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02521
The applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLSA/JAJM recommends denial. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02523
His Discharge Certificate be corrected to reflect staff sergeant versus sergeant; also 547th Night Fighter Squadron versus 54th Night Fighter Squadron. He was given 30 days from the dates of the letters to provide comments concerning the disposition of the missing records and/or any other information relating to his application. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-02523 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02524
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02524 INDEX NUMBER: 111.00, 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 Mar 03 through 19 Mar 04, be removed from his records and he be considered for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02524-2
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his original PRF for the CY04A board; new endorsed PRF; a copy of the Management-Level Review letter of concurrence, dated 25 Apr 06; a copy of AFBCMR Recommendation, dated 9 Mar 06, and an extract from the AFI 36-2401, para A1.6., dated 20 Feb 04, Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE reviewed this...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02525
Counsel indicates that AFPC/DPPPE’s advisory also incorrectly states that the PLOA is not the reason for the referral TR because the TR only mentions the applicant being admonished and not the PLOA itself. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFPC/JA provided an evaluation of the applicant’s case. While rejecting counsel’s assertion the letter of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02531
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not issued medals for his involvement in the Korean Conflict and the French Croix de Guerre was not awarded to him due to his being on rest and relaxation (R&R) at the time of issuance to the crew members. According to DPPPR, the applicant’s record was forwarded to the Office of Assignment on 25 September 2003 to confirm the applicant’s foreign military Service. We agree with the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02534
AF Form 2096, Classification/On-the-Job Training Action, dated 10 December 1973, indicates the applicant was assigned a Primary and Duty Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 43171C, Aircraft Maintenance Technician. Retirement Order AC-32827, dated 9 November 1973, indicates the following: date relieved from active duty - 31 January 1974 with a retirement date of 1 February 1974. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02537
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2005-02537 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02539
PL 92-425, which established the SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an 18- month enrollment period (21 Sep 72 - 20 Mar 74) for retired members to elect SBP coverage, but were not required to return an SBP election form in order to decline coverage. RSFPP participants could have terminated previous RSFPP coverage, or retained it in addition to a new SBP election. There were no provisions in the laws during these open enrollment periods requiring the Services to notify spouses of retired members...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02540
On 30 Apr 81, he voluntarily retired for maximum years of service. Therefore, we adopt the Air Force's rationale as basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Novel, Panel Chair Ms. Renee Collier, Member Ms. Josephine Davis, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 05, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02545
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 January 2006, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment. We, therefore, agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and conclude that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden that she has suffered either an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02548
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-02548 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02549
He appealed and a deal was struck between himself, the SJA and the Wing Commander (WG/CC) that he would meet the next scheduled promotion board in March 2002 and, if selected, and if he made progress in the weight management program, his DOR could be changed to reflect an earlier DOR. Regarding the referral OPR and other issues besides his request to backdate his DOR he notes he qualifies for the requested remedies from the AFBCMR without actually appealing the OPR. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02550
He contends the delay in his promotion to major was due to an administrative oversight, as he should have been promoted to major at the minimum Time In Grade (TIG) of three years instead of the five years he actually served as a captain. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02564
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02564 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Feb 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, lumbosacral strain and knee conditions, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02569
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02569 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 August 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with fourth bronze star, VSM with fifth bronze star, VSM with sixth bronze star, the Korean Defense Service...