RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03731
INDEX CODE: 100.3, 100.06
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 JUN 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a waiverable or
eligible code that would allow him to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The procedures prescribed by regulations may not have been properly
followed.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement
and documents related to his military service.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 6 September 1995,
in the grade of airman basic.
On 14 April 1999, an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration, was initiated not recommending his reenlistment. On 26
April 1999, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was
not selected for reenlistment due to his extensive reprimand history.
On 27 April 1999, he acknowledged receipt of notification of
nonselection for reenlistment and elected to appeal this decision but
failed to do so. On 11 June 1999, the appeal authority concurred with
applicant’s commander and denied his appeal. On 16 June 1999, the
applicant acknowledged the appeal authorities decision.
He was released from active duty on 5 September 1999, under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen,
(completion of required active service), with an honorable discharge
and issued an RE code of 2X “First-term, second-term, or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP.” He
served four years total active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states the applicant’s
performance; failure to obtain retainability for an assignment; along
with 21 various LORs, MFRs and LOCs clearly demonstrate an extensive
history of negative performance and non-conformity to military
standards. Although it is unclear why the applicant’s immediate
supervisor did not initiate the AF Form 418 the applicant’s commander
retained selection/nonselection authority. It is clear the
applicant’s commander made final nonselection and denied reenlistment.
The DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
25 Feb 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are
duly noted; however, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been
the victim of an error or injustice. At the time members are
separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated
upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their
separation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we
believe that given the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the appropriate
directives. Therefore, we find no basis upon which to recommend
favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-03731 in Executive Session on 26 April 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Nov 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 15 Feb 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 05.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561
On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00311
DPPAE recommends a constructive reenlistment be authorized on the applicant effective 1 October 2003, for 4 years and 7 months, as he should have reenlisted upon approval of the retraining. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 30 September 2003, rather than 22 March 2005, and reenlisted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01413
A review of her EPR’s reflects that her promotion recommendation during two performance reporting periods was 2 – “Not recommended for promotion at this time” and a third EPR of 3 – “Consider.” On 22 December 1993, her commander concurred with the non-recommendation of her supervisor and denied her reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00574
He received orders nine months prior to his separation date and never had enough retainability for the assignment. According to information provided in the advisory prepared by the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility at Exhibit C, the applicant was notified of an assignment on 12 May 04 and on 29 Sep 04 voluntarily declined the assignment by signing AF Form 964, “PCS, TDY or Training Declination Statement.” The applicant was separated on 9 Jan 05 after completion of required active...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01271 INDEX NUMBER: 111.02; 126.02; 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs), rendered for the periods 21 October 1997 through 20 October 1998, and 21 October 1998 through 31 May 1999, be declared void and removed from his records; he be made eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02811
His performance to date did not warrant he be selected for reenlistment. On 7 Jan 05, the applicant’s commander concurred with the supervisor’s recommendation and nonselected him for reenlistment. At the end of the deferral period, the applicant received a letter stating his promotion had been placed in a withhold status because of his nonselection for reenlistment.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and indicated that a review of applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration), dated 25 Jul 88, denying her reenlistment. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-00208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nonselection for reenlistment and the Unfavorable Information(UIF)/Control Roster actions be rescinded; she be promoted, with all back pay; and she be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM. DPPAE indicated that a review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed she was nonselected for...
On 1 November 1983, he enlisted in the Regular Air Force, in the grade of airman (E-2), for a period of four years. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant stated that during his four years on active duty he did receive two Article 15s, and they were both alcohol related and were off duty. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00369
As of this date, this office has received no response. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...