Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03633
Original file (BC-2004-03633.doc) Auto-classification: Denied




                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-03633
            INDEX CODE:  100.06
            COUNSEL:  None

            HEARING DESIRED:  No

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  27 May 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to one  that
allows reenlistment in the military.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He  never  received  less  than  an  overall  rating  of  “5”  on  his
performance reports, was promoted to  senior  airman  (SRA),  and  was
awarded “Airman of the Quarter” in his squadron.   He  loved  military
life but was discharged for Personality Disorder due to his method  of
relieving stress [self-mutilation].  He sought  help  for  his  mental
condition and has freed himself from his affliction.  He would like to
rejoin the military and his dedication to his country would make him a
tremendous asset.   He  is  currently  working  at  the  Massachusetts
Institute of Technology as a circuit board  design  engineer  and  lab
manager in the Computer Architecture Group.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty on 25 Oct 95, and  was  assigned  to
the 355th Equipment Maintenance Squadron at Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ,  as
a combat armament  support  team  member.   He  was  promoted  to  SRA
effective 25 Apr 98.  His three Enlisted  Performance  Reports  (EPRs)
have overall ratings of “5.”

The applicant presented to the Mental Health Clinic (MHC) on 12 Feb 99
with issues related  to  dealing  more  positively  with  stress.   He
exhibited logical, coherent, and linear thought processes  and  denied
suicidal  or  homicidal  ideations.   He  indicated  he  had  met  his
counseling goals but wanted to keep his case open for possible follow-
up.

A 25 Feb 99 Primary Care  Report  indicated  the  applicant  described
frequent and/or excessive alcohol consumption  and  family  separation
problems.

On 22 Jun 99, the applicant was assigned to the 44th Fighter  Squadron
(44 FS) at Kadena, Japan.

Within 48 hours of his  arrival  at  Kadena  AB,  on  24 Jun  99,  the
applicant’s  supervisors  referred  him  to   the   Kadena   Community
Counseling  Center  (CCC)  after  he  revealed  a  history  of   self-
mutilation.  He indicated he was lonely, depressed,  and  experiencing
impulses to cut himself.   He  reported  he  cut  himself  to  relieve
feelings of loneliness and stress since  age  13.   He  also  reported
falling in love with a woman while on a 30-day leave prior  to  coming
to Kadena.  He had been referred to the Davis-Monthan  MHC  in  Jan 99
for self-mutilation observed by his roommate.  Provisional  assessment
was  Impulse  Control  Disorder  not  otherwise  specified  (NOS)  and
Adjustment Disorder; Borderline Personality  Disorder  was  suspected.
He  was  started  on  antidepressant  medication  and  scheduled   for
individual counseling.

A 6 Jul 99 Statement of Medical Condition by the CCC flight  commander
noted the applicant had acknowledged his history of self-mutilation at
his last base and was cleared for temporary duty (TDY)  and  permanent
change of station (PCS).  The commander noted that while tissue damage
had been superficial up to this point,  the  applicant’s  difficulties
with impulse control clearly placed him at increased risk for  serious
injury.  He concluded the applicant had an impulse control disorder so
severe that he would continue to experience  significant  difficulties
if  he  remained  on  active  duty.   Administrative   discharge   was
recommended.

The applicant continued counseling at the  Kadena  MHC.   However,  on
20 Jul 05, he reported to the emergency room for razor lacerations  on
his arms, back, and chest that  had  been  self-inflicted  to  relieve
stress.  The event was triggered by his fighting with  his  girlfriend
and then brooding over it.  He indicated he  stopped  cutting  himself
when he “felt better” and called his supervisor  for  a  ride  to  the
hospital.  He denied suicidal ideation.

Also on 20 Jul 05, he was notified of the 44 FS commander’s intent  to
recommend honorable discharge.  The commander  cited  the  applicant’s
referral to the CCC on 24 Jun 99, and the CCC commander’s diagnosis of
Impulse Control  Disorder  NOS,  manifested  by  a  history  of  self-
mutilation, with severely impaired ability to function effectively  in
the military environment.  The applicant acknowledged receipt and  the
advisement of his rights.  The 44 FS commander recommended to the 18th
Wing  Group  (18  WG)  commander  that  the  applicant  be   honorably
discharged  for  a  condition  interfering  with   military   service.
Probation and rehabilitation (P&R) were not recommended because of the
applicant’s long history of self-mutilation, and  that  his  condition
was neither amenable to psychiatric care nor resolvable  by  transfer,
disciplinary action, training, or reclassification.

On 22 Jul 99, the applicant waived his right to  consult  counsel  and
submit statements in rebuttal.  That same date,  18  WG  legal  review
found the case sufficient for discharge and recommended the  applicant
be honorably discharged without P&R.

On 28 Jul 99, after three years, nine months and six  days  of  active
duty, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of  SRA  for
Personality Disorder.  His RE code  was  2C  (Involuntarily  separated
with an honorable discharge).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  AFBCMR  Medical  Consultant  provides   details   regarding   the
applicant’s medical condition.  He advises that the applicant’s  self-
mutilation behavior is strongly indicative of  Borderline  Personality
Disorder. Personality Disorders are not disease but enduring  patterns
of perception, coping, emotions, and behavior that  deviate  from  the
expectations of the individual’s culture (including occupational), and
leads  to  distress  or  impairment  in  social  and/or   occupational
functioning.  The features of a Personality  Disorder  usually  become
recognizable during adolescence or early adult life and are  pervasive
and inflexible.  Manifestations (symptoms and behavior) are frequently
exacerbated by stress and may present with  symptoms  consistent  with
Adjustment Disorder.  In the  applicant’s  case,  he  cut  himself  in
response to stress, in addition to  feelings  of  depressed  mood  and
anxiety.  Manifestations wax and wane  over  time,  depending  on  the
nature and degree of stressors present at any  given  time.   Although
not formally diagnosed with Personality Disorder, the applicant’s long-
standing behavior pattern was  clearly  inflexible,  maladaptive,  and
rendered him  unsuited  for  military  service.   The  fact  that  the
applicant is functioning well at this time does not  predict  that  he
will respond well to the stresses of military operations,  deployment,
or combat when he is separated  from  his  familiar  surroundings  and
usual support system of family and friends.   His  past  inability  to
cope with stress is predictive of recurrence of his behavior  patterns
if re-exposed to the rigors of military service.   Therefore,  the  RE
code should not be changed.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 21 Sep 05 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  The applicant’s contentions  are
duly noted; however, we are  not  persuaded  his  RE  code  should  be
changed.  At the time members are separated from the Air  Force,  they
are furnished an RE code predicated  on  the  circumstances  of  their
separation.  After a thorough review of the  evidence  of  record,  we
agree with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that, given  the  applicant’s
inability  to  adjust  to  military  life,  the  RE  code  issued  was
appropriate and should remain unchanged.  As noted by the  Consultant,
although not formally diagnosed with Borderline Personality  Disorder,
the applicant’s self-mutilation behavior  is  strongly  indicative  of
that condition, and the long-standing  behavior  pattern  was  clearly
inflexible,  maladaptive,  and  unsuitable   for   military   service.
Although the applicant asserts  he  has  “freed  [himself]  from  this
affliction,” he provides no evidence this  is  so  or  that  his  past
inability to cope with stress would not recur if he were again exposed
to the rigors of active duty.  Therefore, we find no basis on which to
recommend favorable action on this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 3 Nov 05 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
                 Mr. James L. Sommer, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-03633 was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Nov 04, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 19 Sep 05.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Sep 05.





                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03214

    Original file (BC-2004-03214.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 October 2002, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling for being late for duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant’s medical records reflect he received medical intervention for alcohol abuse, adjustment disorder, depression, family maltreatment and personality disorder over a period of more than four years. The applicant’s records do not support a medical discharge for a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02235

    Original file (BC-2004-02235.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ADC advised that the applicant had an addiction to pornography, similar to an addiction to alcohol. The ADB recommended he be separated with a general discharge without P&R. Counsel appears to contend, in part, that his client essentially could not stop himself from accessing porn sites on his government computer because of his addictive sexual disorder, and that somehow the Air Force facilitated his misconduct by requiring him to work with government computers.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-01

    Original file (05913-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your reported history suggested a You were diagnosed with an mala- self- On 25 February 1999 you received a general discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality disorder, reenlistment code. The discharge processing documentation is not and were assigned an RE-4 The Board also noted that the Navy views The Board noted the statement in support of your Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005020

    Original file (20130005020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he did not have a personality disorder. c. The record supported a personality disorder diagnosis given the applicant's self-report of his history. Since his depressive issues had resolved at the time of his discharge, his Behavioral Health record did not support referral to a Medical Evaluation Board.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00179

    Original file (FD2005-00179.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicate that the applicant was discharged with an Honorable discharge for Personality Disorder. Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and justification for the request: I was discharged from the Air Force on August 23,2004 and given an honorable discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Conditions That Interfere With Military Service: Mental Disorders - Personality Disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01026

    Original file (ND99-01026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-01026 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990727, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. 940622: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a urinalysis indicating use of THC and severe personality disorder with a characteristic of being an ongoing risk to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03078

    Original file (BC-2003-03078.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander in this case clearly considered all of the information the applicant provided. The Consultant provides details and analysis of the applicant’s military and DVA medical records and finds no evidence to support a diagnosis of Behcet’s disease either in service or following discharge. This is why a military member can receive a disability rating from the DVA without being rated by the Air Force, or receive a higher rating from the DVA than the one awarded by the Air Force.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00152

    Original file (BC-2013-00152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed in order for him to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600189

    Original file (ND0600189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00189 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051107. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Treatment Plan: 8 months LIMDU away for stressor, Depakote for treatment of impulse control/lability, Individual psychotheraphy @ Fleet and Family services, NMCP outpatient crisis intervention program Limitations: Shore duty only – no weekends, nights, or rotating shifts.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02344

    Original file (BC-2004-02344.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02344 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 FEB 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on his DD Form 214 be removed. The specific reasons for the discharge action were: The 6 April 1981 MHC evaluation diagnosis of personality disorder and...