RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03760
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Over the years he has seen how big of an error in judgment he made.
He can’t change what happened, but he does see it could have been
better. He has been doing his best all these years to improve his
life. He raised a family, and has had his own business.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement, two
character references and a copy of his DD Form 214.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s master personnel record (MPR) appears to have been
destroyed by the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center
(NPRC) in St. Louis.
Based on the available documentation the following facts are provided.
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 December 1952 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years.
On 25 October 1956, while serving in the grade of airman second class,
he was discharged under the provision of AFR 39-17 (Unfitness) and
separated with an undesirable discharge. He had served 3 years, 2
months and 8 days on active duty with 242 days of lost time.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 7 January 2005, applicant was invited to provide information
pertaining to his activities since leaving the service. On 25 January
2005, a copy of his FBI Report was forwarded for review and response
(Exhibit D).
Applicant states his first year in the service was not very good -- he
went AWOL because he was homesick. After he got it out of his head he
liked being in the Air Force. He got in trouble again; he took gas
from a military truck for his car. He was late on a three-day pass.
They had an accident and had to hitchhike back to base. He would have
liked to stay in the Air Force.
After getting out of the service, it took him a few years to find out
what he would do with his life. He got married and raised four
children. His children are all grown and married now. He went to
work as a truck driver, hauling cars for 13 years and 17 years as an
over-the-road freight hauler. Nine of the last 17 years he has owned
his own trucking business. He retired in 1995. He has been doing his
best all these years to improve his life. Now he would like to
upgrade his service record.
Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
Applicant provided a statement in regards to his FBI Report stating
after 1961 he found a good job and has straightened his life out. He
has been doing well ever since. He hopes his life record is looked at
after 1961. He raised his family and helped raise a stepfamily. He
was a responsible worker and business owner. In retirement, he is
enjoying his grandchildren.
Applicant’s response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. After a thorough review of the evidence of record, we see no
evidence to show that the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or
unjust. However, the Board majority recognizes the adverse impact of
the discharge the applicant received; and while it may have been
appropriate at the time, the Board majority believes it would be an
injustice for the applicant to continue to suffer its effects. In
consideration of the applicant’s current age, his apparent immaturity
at the time of his enlistment, the absence of evidence that he had any
involvement of a derogatory nature in more than 40 years and his
apparent successful adjustment to civilian life since 1961, the Board
majority believes corrective action is appropriate based on clemency.
Accordingly, we recommend that his records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 25 October 1956, he
was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 1 March 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended approval of the application.
Mr. Charles E. Bennett voted to deny the application but does not
desire to submit a Minority Report. The following documentary
evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03760 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Nov 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letters, AFBCMR, dated 7 and 25 Jan 05, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 17 Jan 05, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Applicant’s Response, dated 2 Feb 05.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03760
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 25 October
1956, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1993-02122B
An accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale of the original Board’s decision is provided in the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 31 Aug 05, this Board reconsidered and again denied the applicant’s appeal for an honorable discharge and an amended narrative reason, concluding the post-service information he provided was meager and insufficient to overcome his misconduct while in the service and, according to the FBI report,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1993-02122A
On 29 Sep 92, in a personal appearance, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request for an honorable discharge and a changed reason for separation. He did not realize until years after his discharge that he was an alcoholic, making it impossible for him to drink in “moderation” as the Air Force had advised. Complete copies of his submissions, with attachments, are provided at Exhibit F. On 19 May 05, the AFBCMR Staff invited the applicant to submit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02506
On 9 October 1979, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling regarding his job performance. On 17 December 1979, he was discharged under honorable conditions under the provisions of AFR 39-12 (Unsuitable - Personality Disorder). After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence that would warrant an upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01122
The Board took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the majority of the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopts the OPR’s rationale as the basis for its conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03271
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 December 1984 in the grade of airman basic. He had not completed the program at the time of his discharge from active duty. The evidence of record indicates the applicant had been entered into the Alcohol Rehabilitation program and had not completed the program at the time of his separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00970
On 27 Apr 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied his request that his UOTHC discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded and that his felony conviction be erased from his civilian records.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00268
However, his record contains a DD Form 2366, MGIB Act of 1984, electing conversion from the VEAP to MGIB, dated 28 Aug 01. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. CHARLES E. BENNETT Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1995-00986A
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit G. On 12 February 1996, the deceased member’s wife submitted a letter and additional documentation requesting her deceased spouse’s records be corrected to reflect a medical retirement. The Air Force’s evaluation, in our opinion, adequately addresses the widow’s contentions concerning the member’s fitness for continued military service at the time of his separation. ...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit G. On 12 February 1996, the deceased member’s wife submitted a letter and additional documentation requesting her deceased spouse’s records be corrected to reflect a medical retirement. The Air Force’s evaluation, in our opinion, adequately addresses the widow’s contentions concerning the member’s fitness for continued military service at the time of his separation. ...