AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02222
AFBCMR BC-2004-02222 Index Number: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX SSAN: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02228
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02228 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53-55 - Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. They researched the applicant’s personnel record and documents attached to the WD AGO 53-55; they...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02233
We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed to an honorable discharge. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. However, after a thorough review of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02234
In support of the application, the applicant submits a statement from the former member’s daughter, an Air Force Discharge Review Board application, a Certification of Military Service, an Honorable Discharge Certificate (AF Reserves), a medical prognosis, letter from National Personnel Records Center, and a general power of attorney. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02238
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant provides a resume of her education and experience and a copy of her transcript where she was awarded her Bachelor of Science in Nursing and Master of Science in Nursing. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02240
INDEX CODE: 110.02 BC-2004-02240 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02241
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2004-02241 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02249
On 14 March 2000, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. He had served for 28 days at the time of his discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial noting that the applicant provided no evidence to support his claim.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02254
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the PH since he was wounded in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that they could not find any support for award of the PH. Should the applicant provide evidence that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action, the Board will...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02255 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. On 12 October 2004, the applicant was provided the opportunity to respond to the FBI investigation within 14 days (Exhibit E). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02257
Based on available documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Although the applicant did not specifically request consideration based on clemency, we also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on that basis. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Aug 04 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Aug 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02260
The following background information was extracted from the 27 Mar 97 USAFA Military Review Committee (MRC) Action Executive Summary and related attachments: As a 4th classman, the applicant was counseled in Mar 95 about an unprofessional relationship with a female 2nd classman. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The 10th Medical Group commander (10MDG/CC), USAFA, advised he did not have the applicant’s medical record from 1997 because...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02262
He was serving on the control roster at the time of his discharge. A complete copy of the DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 22 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02274
AFBCMR BC-2004-02274 INDEX CODE: 112.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02279
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Based on the applicant’s length of service, his retired pay was calculated at 2.5% times 20 years resulting in retired pay of 50% of his final basic pay. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02285
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, and Mr. John E. B. Smith, considered this application on 1 September 2004. AFBCMR BC-2004-02285 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02286
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement, he was not married and elected child only SBP coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states a servicemember, who is unmarried at retirement and later marries, may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse, as long as the election is made before the first anniversary of the marriage. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02291
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied, and states, based on the documentation on file and the date stamp on the applicant’s OPR, the report was in fact filed in the record for the Board’s review. The date was applied to the form, by a records processing clerk assigned to the AFPC Records Section, upon filing the document in the official officer selection record. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02293
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and since he completed a total of 36 combat missions, he should be awarded two additional AMs. In this respect, we note the applicant completed a total of 36 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air Force as a B- 24 airplane commander. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02295
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02295 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to active duty or his general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 31 December 2003, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s general (under honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02301
On 27 Jul 88, the squadron section commander reviewed the case file and felt the applicant’s request for conscientious objector status was sincere. He provided no facts warranting a change to his narrative reason for separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004- 02301 in Executive Session on 5 October 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair Mr....
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02307
AFBCMR BC-2004-02307 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02308
On 7 Jun 94, she elected to accept separation from the Air Force in lieu of a waiver of discharge processing. They recommended against changing the RE code as there is no error in the applicant’s records. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAT advises that DOD records indicate the applicant accepted MGIB enrollment on 12 Mar 93.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02320
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02320 INDEX CODE:137.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect that he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR states...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02323
Based on Comptroller General Decision B-201478, OM, dated 7 Aug 81, she was allowed to rent her own rental property. The Comptroller General decision seems to authorize some monthly expenses in circumstances like the applicant’s. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02329
AFBCMR BC-2004-02329 INDEX CODE: 135.02 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSAN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02333
INDEX CODE 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-02333 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02336
SBP payments terminated because DIC payments are greater than $238. Under the Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Action, the former spouse’s right to payments based on a division of retired pay terminated upon the death of the former member. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 2 December 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02339
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02339 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The daughter of the former member requests her father’s under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02346
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02346 INDEX CODE 110.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed and he be reinstated in the Air Force with reclassification into another career field. Separation was recommended for those airmen who exhibited disciplinary/motivational...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02349
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02349 INDEX CODE: 100.06 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be changed to honorable and his narrative reason for separation be changed. We considered applicant’s request for a change in the reason for separation, however, as noted by...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02350
AFBCMR BC-2004-00838 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02357
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02357 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded. He received 14 days’ restriction. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence that would warrant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02361
By letter, dated 5 October 1961, the Personnel Services Division, advised the applicant that the 722d Bomb Squadron, 450th Bomb Group was authorized the following campaigns: Air Offensive Europe, Naples-Foggia, Rome Arno and Air Combat, European-African-Middle Eastern Theater. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02363
AFBCMR BC-2004-02363 INDEX NUMBER: 112.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02365
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-02365 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02367
The regulation in effect at that time required that a member be issued an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 5 November 1954, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02371
AFBCMR BC-2004-02371 INDEX CODE: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02375
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02375 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his discharge from the Air Force be changed from “Misconduct” to “Convenience of the Government.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02381
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02381 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry-level separation be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. The reason for this action was the applicant made a statement that he was bisexual and requested to be discharged from the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02395
On 30 October 1975, the Numbered AF commander approved the discharge, without P&R. On 6 December 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded. At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02397 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received a promotion to technical sergeant (TSgt) while he was a Prisoner of War (POW). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02399
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement from the Air Force he elected child coverage under the SBP. If his daughter’s disability was diagnosed while she was otherwise eligible, the member could have elected coverage on her behalf during the initial open enrollment; however, there is no evidence such an election was submitted. We believe the applicant would have elected to provide coverage for his daughter...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02400
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Mr. Terry L. Scott, and Mr. James W. Russell III considered this application on 28 September 2004. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPTR dtd 1 Sep 04 AFBCMR BC-2004-02400 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02401
AFBCMR BC-2004-02401 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02406
Based on the applicant’s condition of pain in the right side of his heel and ankle while on extended active duty from 9 April 2002 to 25 August 2002, a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) was convened to consider his case. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02408
To accept the assignment, she extended her enlistment by 17 months. After notification, she had to reenlist for four years in order to accept the assignment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02410
Eligibility for ECLRP is determined by Air Force Recruiting Services at the time a member enlists into the Air Force. The applicant makes no contentions, and the evidence of record appears to support the rationale provided by the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02411
AWC records do not reflect he requested any extensions, which are often given as a result of deployments. As such, the majority of the Board believes he should be given an opportunity to write letters to the president of each board he was considered for promotion to the grade of colonel beginning with the CY02B Colonel Central Selection Board. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02418
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...