RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02286
INDEX CODE:137.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to allow him to elect spouse coverage under
the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time of his retirement, he was not married and elected child
only SBP coverage. He was not counseled properly on possible future
elections if he were to marry.
Also, during the 1999 open enrollment season he was in the hospital
for open heart surgery.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant, prior to his 1 March 1986 retirement, elected child
only SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay. His
records reflect the last dependent child became ineligible for SBP in
July 1994. The applicant and S. were married on 13 August 1998. He
failed to submit a valid spouse election within the first year
following their marriage.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPTR states a servicemember, who is unmarried at retirement and
later marries, may elect coverage for a newly acquired spouse, as long
as the election is made before the first anniversary of the marriage.
The Afterburner, News For USAF Retired Personnel, informed retired
servicemembers of the requirement to elect coverage within the first
year of marriage for a newly acquired spouse. Furthermore,
information regarding the 1999-2000 open enrollment was published in
four consecutive issues of the Afterburner (January, May, September
1999 and January 2000). The January 2000 issue was mailed to the
address the applicant provided the finance center, the same address he
currently resides. Although the applicant contends he was
hospitalized during the open enrollment period, he has not provided
any documentation showing he received medical treatment that impaired
him physically or mentally that affected his ability to submit an
election for spouse coverage. DPPTR further states to approve this
request would provide the applicant an additional opportunity to elect
SBP coverage not afforded to other retired servicemembers similarly
situated. AFPC/DPPTR finds no evidence of error or injustice and
therefore, recommends the requested relief be denied.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant submitted documentation regarding his medical condition
during the contested time period (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. After thoroughly
reviewing the documentation submitted with this appeal, it is
reasonable to believe the servicemember may have been unaware of his
responsibility or unable to make an SBP election for his new spouse
following his August 1998 remarriage. In coming to this conclusion,
we note that during early 1999, he underwent open-heart surgery and
rehabilitative therapy and may have been unable to make an election
during the open season. Furthermore, we note it had been several
years since his retirement when he remarried and while we cannot
determine at this late date what pre-retirement SBP counseling he
received regarding any future SBP elections, we are persuaded the
applicant would have made the election for his new spouse had he been
aware of this requirement. In this respect, the applicant
demonstrated his intent to provide coverage for his family as
evidenced by his election of child only coverage when he retired.
Furthermore, the applicant has stated his willingness to repay all
premiums. In consideration of the totality of the circumstances, we
recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 12 August 1999, he
elected to add spouse coverage to his suspended child only coverage
under the Survivor Benefit Plan, based on a reduced level of retired
pay.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02286 in Executive Session on 24 September 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 May 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 18 Aug 04.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Aug 04.
Exhibit D. Applicant’s Response, dated 13 Sep 04, w/atchs.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02286
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance
with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it
is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 12 August
1999, he elected to add spouse coverage to his suspended child only
coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan, based on a reduced level
of retired pay.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02286
The laws governing SBP prohibits a married service member from electing coverage under SBP for a former spouse if the service member declined coverage prior to retirement unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment period. Open enrollment packages were mailed to all retired service members advising them of the opportunity to make or change an SBP election. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00339
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Records indicate that, prior to his 1 April 1989 retirement, the applicant (who was married at the time of his election) elected child only coverage based on full, retired pay. It would be inequitable to those members, who chose to elect spouse coverage when eligible and subsequently received reduced retired pay, to provide an additional opportunity for the applicant to change his SBP election. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04100
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Public Law (PL) 99-145 requires spouses of married servicemembers to concur in writing prior to the servicemember’s retirement, in the SBP election that provides less than full spouse coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states the applicant contends the finance center did not have her husband’s information to process an election. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02681
He received a response in September 2003, informing him the request he submitted was not received until after the authorized open enrollment period. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B. After his first marriage ended, he remarried in February 1998; however, his current spouse is not eligible to receive RSFPP because the marriage occurred after the applicant retired.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02796
The applicant did not add his spouse to his existing child coverage within the first year of their marriage. Furthermore, Item H1 clearly and specifically describes the post-retirement option: servicemembers, who at the time of retirement had no spouse or child, are eligible to elect SPB for these dependents within one year of acquisition. Furthermore, it was nearly five years after he retired that he got married and at the time of his marriage, he had no recollection of the one-year time...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01398
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR indicates that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) was established by Public Law (PL) 92-425 on 21 September 1972, authorizing a one-year open enrollment period for servicemembers to elect coverage. However, if the Board recommends granting the request, the servicemember’s record should be corrected to show the servicemember elected SBP spouse only coverage based on full retired pay effective 21...
There were no provisions in the law at that time to notify spouses if the servicemember did not elect coverage. There is no evidence that the servicemember elected SBP during any of the authorized open enrollments. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01037
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states Public Law (PL) 99-145, established on 8 November 1985, required as of 1 March 1986 spousal concurrence of the SBP election, if the election was providing less than maximum spouse coverage. According to the Defense Finance and Service - Cleveland Center (DAFS- CL) the servicemember elected full spouse and child coverage under SBP, but later submitted a corrected election to decline SBP...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02320
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02320 INDEX CODE:137.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s records be corrected to reflect that he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPTR states...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00233
He requested SBP spouse coverage in September 2003 and was informed he could not elect spouse coverage due to the one- year time limit. Although the applicant contends he was not aware of the one-year time limit, the Afterburner, News For USAF Retired Personnel, informed retired servicemembers of the requirement to elect coverage within the first year of marriage for a newly acquired spouse. In this respect, a member who is not married at the time of retirement and marries later may elect...