RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02262
INDEX CODE: 100.3, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be upgraded from 4I (Serving
on the Control Roster) after 28 October 2004.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The control roster expired on 28 October 2004 and has been destroyed.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 September 1999,
in the grade of airman basic.
On 11 May 2004, he was notified by his commander he was recommending
he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, (Force Shaping Date of
Separation Rollback Program), with an honorable discharge. He
acknowledged receipt of the discharge with the understanding that his
new date of separation would be 50 calendar days from the date of
notification. He was separated from the Air Force on 29 June 2004,
with an honorable discharge. He was issued a RE code of 4I “Serving
on the Control Roster”. He served 4 years, 9 months, and 15 days
total active federal military service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the applicant’s own admission,
he was serving on the control roster at the time of his separation.
The applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors
or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided
no facts warranting a change to his RE code.
A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states they conducted a review of
the applicant’s personnel records and found nothing to support the
course of action requested by the applicant. He was serving on the
control roster at the time of his discharge.
A complete copy of the DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
22 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. Evidence has not been
provided in support of his appeal, which would lead us to believe that
a change to his RE code is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the
opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. We further note the applicant’s reenlistment eligibility
code “4I” is a waiverable code and if he wishes to reenter military
service, the respective service may waive the RE code depending upon
the recruiting needs of the service at the time, and the applicant may
be allowed to reenlist. Therefore, in view of the above and in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-02262 in Executive Session on 9 December 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 04.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 5 Oct 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 12 Oct 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Oct 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01150
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01150 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCTOBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03392
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004- 03392 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 MAY 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 3K be changed to a more favorable 1-series RE code. To date, they have not received any additional documentation or had any contact...
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman, was discharged from the Air Force on 1 June 2001 under provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (pregnancy or childbirth), with an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at that time. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02562
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRS states based on the fact applicant was serving in the grade of airman first class and had completed over 31 months of active duty, she was ineligible to reenlist or extend her enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00444 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her enlistment in the Armed Forces. Although the applicant states that she requested discharge, there is no letter from the applicant requesting a discharge. Insufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01243
On 16 July 1987 the commander notified applicant he was being placed on the control roster effective 16 July 1987. Therefore, at the time of his discharge, he was still serving on the control roster. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01938
Specifically, he was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation. In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, “Airmen separating with RE code 4H or 4I will be separated with SPD code JBK.” He was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation thereby validating the SPD and RE code he received. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03089
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03089 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 5 October 1982, the applicant received notification that he was being recommended for discharge due to his failure to perform assigned duties properly. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-01151
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01151 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: ANTHONY W. WALLUK XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded a 20-year active duty retirement in the grade of master sergeant (E-7) effective June 1996. The applicant’s file contains a request from...