AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02116
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She enlisted into the Air Force Reserve on 20 February 2002 in an Air Force Specialty (AFS) that is authorized a bonus. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 August 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. In this respect, Air Force Specialty...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02119
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His 12 June 2002 OPR should be corrected to change his duty title and add text in the last line of Section III, Key Duties, Task, and Responsibilities. He further states that his OPR references several times about his qualifications as an instructor pilot and also recommends he should be upgraded to a Evaluator Pilot. PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 2 May 00 Meets Standards 30 Jul 01 Meets...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02120
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Air Medal (AM) awarded for the period 21 January 2002 to 26 April 2002 was not reflected on his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) that was reviewed by the CY02B Colonel CSB. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2003-02123 INDEX CODE 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1978 bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. He was granted a reduction in his adjudged sentence by the convening authority and a further reduction by the Court of Military Review. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02124
INDEX CODE: 112.00. Members of the Board, Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, and Mr. Mike Novel, considered this application on 5 August 2003. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 7 Jul 03, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2003-02124 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02129
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS indicated that they were unable to determine the propriety of the applicant's discharge based on the lack of documentation in his records. In their view, the applicant did not identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide any facts that supported upgrading his discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02136
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02136 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge for fraudulent enlistment be set aside and he receive active duty credit for an honorable discharge. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02142
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) brief indicates that the applicant was reduced in grade to airman basic on 11 May 1967 as a result of an Article 15. The commander recommended an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003- 02142 in Executive Session on 23 September 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair Ms. Jean A....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02149
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2003-02149 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02153
He is not entitled to full reimbursement of his airline tickets purchased for travel from Los Angeles to Baltimore, because it exceeds the MALT PLUS between Atlanta and Baltimore. He was briefed that he could not be issued government travel tickets for his leave travel. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02158
The applicant did not report for duty on 5 Feb 75. One reference is from his wife and the other appears to be from a friend. Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 14 Aug 03, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02159
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had problems during basic training and had to complete three extra months at basic. His grade at the time of discharge was airman basic, with an effective date and date of rank of 16 Jul 69. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02160
The Discharge Authority approved the discharge on 25 October 1973 and ordered a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the findings of the Administrative Discharge Board should be set aside and his discharge upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003- 02160 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02162
AFBCMR BC-2003-02162 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02163
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that the spouse of the former member is entitled to other benefits as the unremarried widow of a retirement eligible member. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The spouse of the former member states that a package was sent certified mail and signed for by...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02166
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Mr. James W. Russell, and Ms. Brenda L. Romine considered this application on 31 July 2003. PHILIP SHEUERMAN Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 14 Jul 03, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2003-02166 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02170
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the enlistment grade of E-4 based on active duty time served with the Air National Guard. On 24 January 2002, the applicant enlisted and both initialed and signed an AF Form 3006, Enlistment Agreement - Prior Service, stating “I am enlisting in pay grade E-3. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02171
This provision does not apply to Army or Air Force officers, nor does it authorize promotions for former POWs. They reviewed the record of the applicant’s spouse and all applicable regulations in regard to POW promotions and can find no documentation/provision to support an earlier promotion date to the grade of first lieutenant. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02172 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant's request for reinstatement, with grade and date of rank as of the date of discharge, was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 21 June...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02182
The applicant performed as a recruiter for only 123 days after the 21 Jun 00 date. DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the criteria for awarding of both AF Recruiting Ribbon and the award of two points for WAPS testing is established in MPFM 00-39 and attachments. The attachment to MPFM 00-39 specifying the guidelines states in the introduction,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02183
INDEX CODE: 129.02 AFBCMR BC-2003-02183 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 2003-02185 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for a position vacancy (PV) promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year 2004A (FY04A) Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Major PV Board. He was not considered for a PV promotion by the FY04 board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02187
AFPC/DPPTR also states that there is no evidence in the servicemember’s records to indicate that he elected to participate in the RSFPP or SBP during any of the authorized enrollment periods. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02190
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS believes the 25 Sep 57 general discharge was consistent with the discharge regulation in effect at the time and within the discretion of the discharge authority. They believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02193
On 28 August 2002, the commander notified the applicant of his intent to impose nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for violating Article 86 (i.e., Absent Without Authority (AWOL)). We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation applicant submitted in support of his appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02194
On 2 June 2003, the applicant requested that the finance center stop the SBP. Furthermore, the applicant failed to respond to their 7 July 2003 letter requesting he obtain a notarized statement completed by his wife in which she acknowledges retired pay ceases when the applicant dies, that she is currently eligible to receive an annuity valued at approximately $774 per month (after the age of 62, no less than $492), and approval of this request would result in her receiving no...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02196
AFBCMR BC-2003-02196 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSAN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02200
The applicant’s request under AFI 36-2401 to have the contested EPR removed from his records was denied by the ERAB. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02200 in Executive Session on 8 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair Ms. Martha Maust, Member Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member By majority vote, the Board voted to deny the application. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02201
The Numbered Air Force IG concurred with the IO that the third allegation was unsubstantiated. The Numbered Air Force IG found this allegation to be substantiated. The AFPC/DPPPE evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 22 August 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was sent to the applicant for review and comment.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02206 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the AFCM on or near the last day of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02209
His commander had not submitted his name to the promotion board. DPPI states the applicant’s records contain no evidence to support his statement that he was ever recommended for promotion. The NY ANG holds that had an oversight been committed regarding his promotion, it would have been corrected during the year that passed between the time the board met and the applicant retired.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02210
While he was a Deputy Commander at the time the PRF was written, he was actually the IG when the promotion board met. Selection board members use the "whole person" concept when evaluating an officer for promotion to the next higher grade. We note that the OSB that was prepared for the selection board accurately reflected his completion of Air War College.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02213
The applicant, while serving in the grade of Airman First Class, was separated from the Air Force under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) on 27 May 1977. His SPD reveals separation under the provisions of AFR 39-12, Section F, Request for Discharge in Lieu of Trial by Courts-Martial. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02214
On 22 May 2003, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable and his RE Code and reason and authority for discharge be changed. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: He will always have a mark against him as long as his records remain unchanged. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02218
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate that he enlisted in the Army of the United States (AUS) on 12 Mar 44 in the grade of private. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial indicating that after 1944, the DFC and Air Medal were no longer awarded automatically, based on the number of combat missions flown, but a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02220
Members of the Board, Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, and Mr. William H. Anderson, considered this application on 7 July 2003. CHARLES E. BENNETT Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ ARPC/DPP, dtd 3 Jul 03 w/atch AFBCMR BC-2003-02220 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02221
Information extracted from applicant’s submission reveals the AF Form 63, ADSC Acknowledgement Statement, signed on 17 January 2003, indicates that the three-year ADSC she incurred was for the Air Force Intern Program (AFIP). The three-year ADSC associated with AFIP is not and has never been contingent upon the graduate-level coursework/degree at GWU, therefore, the basis of the applicant’s ADSC waiver is invalid. We note that the AFIP ADSC is not contingent on a graduate degree and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02222
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 November 1999 in the grade of airman basic for a period of four years with a date of separation (DOS) of 16 November 2003. The Board believes that if he had a problem understanding the form he should have raised any questions or concerns he had at that time. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 August 2003.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02223
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR BC-2003-02223 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02224
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2003-02224 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02225
AFBCMR BC-2003-02225 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02226
AFBCMR BC-2003-02226 INDEX CODE: 100.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02227
Regarding the applicant’s request for the PHM, DPPPR notes that applicant’s record does not substantiate his claims of having been wounded by the enemy. Additionally, there was no evidence provided by the applicant to substantiate his claim of being recommended for the DFC; consequently, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02228
The applicant’s file does not contain an AF Form 31, Airman’s Request for Early Separation/Separation Based on Change in Service Obligation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her SPD code needs to be amended. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02232
After a thorough review of the available evidence, a majority of the Board is sufficiently persuaded that the applicant’s LOR for dereliction of duty may have been somewhat harsh. The majority noted that the applicant was recruiter. After consideration of his appeal, a majority of the Board believed the LOR was too harsh and recommended the LOR be voided and removed from the applicant’s records.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02237
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02237 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded three Purple Heart (PH) Medals and the Presidential Unit Citation. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was injured three times and told that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02241
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant did not provide any documentation showing that he qualified as Expert on an Air Force firing range. Dean Yount, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02244
INDEX CODE 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2003-02244 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02248
At the end of his 90-day suspense the applicant was automatically enrolled in Option C, “Immediate coverage for spouse.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends denial. The RCSBP package that was sent to the applicant stated “if the completed ARPC Form 123 is not received at the Reserve Center or postmarked within 90 calendar days of receipt of this package at residence or current mailing address, the member is considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02258
Exceptions to this policy are only considered when the airman can support a previous submission with documentation or statements including conclusive evidence that the recommendation was officially placed into military channels within the prescribed time limits and conclusive evidence that the decoration was not acted upon due to loss or inadvertence. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...